Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Thursday, February 17, 2011
NASCAR.COM
NASCAR should be ashamed of their official website, NASCAR,com. Okay, we'll even grant them that popular websites have to throw in a few roadblocks to force viewers to look at some advertisements, but try to find what you're looking for such as the results to the first of the Duel 125's after the second race is completed.
Finding vital information on Sprint Cup is tough enough but to dig for information on Nationwide or Trucks is even tougher.
The changes made for the 2011 site are a total failure. 2010 was the best since 2001 when Turner took over site development from ESPN who did a great job with much less technology available back then.
Version 2011 is the absolute sloppiest, poorly laid-out and incoherent sports or information website this writer has ever seen. Even basic blog templates could create something better.
SHAME ON NASCAR AND ITS INTERNET PARTNER.
Okay, if you want information overload, there's Jayski,com. It might not be sophisticated. It might take some digging, but EVERYTHING is there, somewhere. For a quick fix, ESPN.COM of Fox Sports far exceed the "official" site.
Please where ever possible, if you're a NASCAR fan, BITCH ABOUT THIS. WE MUST MAKE THEM RESPOND.
.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Real Live Sci-Fi: Man's Implant Infects Computers
Thursday, April 29, 2010
New Jersey Principal Demands Parents Forbid Online Socializing

Time marches on and the hands of time have no reverse setting. There is an increasingly more aggressive and imposing climate among society’s elites to legislate private behavior. This is the third article this week where we address another aspect of the nanny state. The culprit this time is public education. The issue is a New Jersey middle school principal is imploring to have parents forbid their children from social networking and text messaging.
Principal Anthony Orsini, Benjamin Franklin Middle School, in Ridgewood, New Jersey sent out an email on Wednesday asking parents to help get all the school’s students off social networking sites and to get them to stay off text messaging.
He wrote:
"Please do the following: sit down with your child (and they are just children still) and tell them that they are not allowed to be a member of any social networking site. Today! "Let them know that you will at some point every week be checking their text messages online! You have the ability to do this through your cell phone provider. "Let them know that you will be installing Parental Control Software so you can tell every place they have visited online, and everything they have instant messaged or written to a friend. Don't install it behind their back, but install it!"
"It is time for every single member of the BF Community to take a stand! There is absolutely no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site!"Let me repeat that - there is absolutely, positively no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site! None."
Beneath the shroud of being the assertive strong leader what surely is a part of it is fearing the repercussion of possible events which could happen at his school. There have been a few alarming reports of Facebook postings being used to bully students and spread gossip including the case of a girl driven to her own suicide.
There is no question the use of computers opens kids up to all kinds of new possibilities both good and bad. From the first chat rooms widely used in the 1990’s, there have been situations where kids have been lured into bad situations. However, do we see any coverage of the good?
Maybe we just take that for granted, but kids have so many more options to talk to other kids who share their interests and experiences. Kids who’d otherwise be lonely have many new possibilities.
Parents do take on a huge responsibility when they allow their children to use computers. It’s not a toy where kids can just be given the machine and away they go. Every parent must have a firm conversation with his or her kids and establish what their kids can and can’t use their computers for and what on-line behavior is forbidden. Additionally, parental control software should be setup that monitors their kids’ activities and shuts off access to off limit sites. Additionally, kids should not have computers in their bedrooms. The computers they use should be in a common area in the house with no expectation of privacy that mom and dad could be looking over their shoulders at any time.
The approach should be more one of guidance and less one of being punitive. Kids will not be happy either way but if they understand where their parents are coming from it won’t be as bad. Why not print out where the kids have visited on line and discuss it with the kids?
“I see you’ve been out on the Ravens site a lot this week. What do you think of their draft picks?” “Oh Fox News, I didn’t know you were following the news. Tell me, what did you learn out there?” Taking such an approach takes the threatening aspects out of it, and besides a well-informed adult could see trends or interests and maybe make some suggestions where they might find some more interesting stuff that’s perfectly acceptable.
Humans are social animals. Kids are especially social. In a world where parents are less likely to want kids to travel from one neighborhood to the next unsupervised, kids might now find their community on line. Encouraging the proper etiquette of social networking is all part of the learning and growing process. Likewise, parents should establish guidelines on what time kids can use their computers. Kids need to get outside, exercise, play around outside, and not become couch potatoes.
What does not work and is absolutely regressive is outright prohibition. It’s all too easy and way too ignorant to slam the door on things that might cause isolated trouble and some inconveniences. Principal Orsini is way over the line. Hopefully, members of the community will actively challenge him.
Principal Anthony Orsini, Benjamin Franklin Middle School, in Ridgewood, New Jersey sent out an email on Wednesday asking parents to help get all the school’s students off social networking sites and to get them to stay off text messaging.
He wrote:
"Please do the following: sit down with your child (and they are just children still) and tell them that they are not allowed to be a member of any social networking site. Today! "Let them know that you will at some point every week be checking their text messages online! You have the ability to do this through your cell phone provider. "Let them know that you will be installing Parental Control Software so you can tell every place they have visited online, and everything they have instant messaged or written to a friend. Don't install it behind their back, but install it!"
"It is time for every single member of the BF Community to take a stand! There is absolutely no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site!"Let me repeat that - there is absolutely, positively no reason for any middle school student to be a part of a social networking site! None."
Beneath the shroud of being the assertive strong leader what surely is a part of it is fearing the repercussion of possible events which could happen at his school. There have been a few alarming reports of Facebook postings being used to bully students and spread gossip including the case of a girl driven to her own suicide.
There is no question the use of computers opens kids up to all kinds of new possibilities both good and bad. From the first chat rooms widely used in the 1990’s, there have been situations where kids have been lured into bad situations. However, do we see any coverage of the good?
Maybe we just take that for granted, but kids have so many more options to talk to other kids who share their interests and experiences. Kids who’d otherwise be lonely have many new possibilities.
Parents do take on a huge responsibility when they allow their children to use computers. It’s not a toy where kids can just be given the machine and away they go. Every parent must have a firm conversation with his or her kids and establish what their kids can and can’t use their computers for and what on-line behavior is forbidden. Additionally, parental control software should be setup that monitors their kids’ activities and shuts off access to off limit sites. Additionally, kids should not have computers in their bedrooms. The computers they use should be in a common area in the house with no expectation of privacy that mom and dad could be looking over their shoulders at any time.
The approach should be more one of guidance and less one of being punitive. Kids will not be happy either way but if they understand where their parents are coming from it won’t be as bad. Why not print out where the kids have visited on line and discuss it with the kids?
“I see you’ve been out on the Ravens site a lot this week. What do you think of their draft picks?” “Oh Fox News, I didn’t know you were following the news. Tell me, what did you learn out there?” Taking such an approach takes the threatening aspects out of it, and besides a well-informed adult could see trends or interests and maybe make some suggestions where they might find some more interesting stuff that’s perfectly acceptable.
Humans are social animals. Kids are especially social. In a world where parents are less likely to want kids to travel from one neighborhood to the next unsupervised, kids might now find their community on line. Encouraging the proper etiquette of social networking is all part of the learning and growing process. Likewise, parents should establish guidelines on what time kids can use their computers. Kids need to get outside, exercise, play around outside, and not become couch potatoes.
What does not work and is absolutely regressive is outright prohibition. It’s all too easy and way too ignorant to slam the door on things that might cause isolated trouble and some inconveniences. Principal Orsini is way over the line. Hopefully, members of the community will actively challenge him.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
February 1, 2010: The Day America Turned its Back on the Future

Freedom 7, May 1961: America's first manned
space excursion. This September, America will
launch its last manned space mission.
x
x
In the wee hours of Saturday morning at 4:39 am, mission STS-130 will be launched aboard Space Shuttle Endeavor. It will be Endeavor’s next to last flight. Between now and September, Saturday’s launch will be one of the five final Space Shuttle missions all designed to finish the build out of the International Space Station. Atlantis has one more flight, STS-132 in May. Discovery flies with missions STS-131 in March and the final Shuttle flight STS-133 tentatively set to launch on September 16th. Endeavor makes its last flight in July.
When Discovery touches down at the end of its mission, that’s it, the end of manned space missions from the United States. What started with great fanfare with Alan Shepherd’s first flight in May of 1961 will evaporate with a whimper almost 50 years later. Considering the last lunar mission was in December, 1972, most of the fireworks all took place in the first twelve years of the program. While surely a space station in continuous operation has its scientific and technological merit, it is a far cry from that which we are capable of developing. Further, considering that which was originally planned and how much has been compromised, the station is only a glimmer of what could have been.
With the Obama administration not funding Project Constellation and the Ares Rocket program which just recently launched its first test missile, all manned space efforts on the part of NASA will be over with no provisions to go further. Constellation was the mission to guide us into the future with earth orbit and lunar missions in the planning stages to set the stage for bolder missions beyond.
Now what is there to look forward to? With the delivery of the huge volumes of the trillions of dollars in the proposed Federal Budget, a conspicuous devil in the details was waving the white flag and surrendering America’s lead as the premier space program in the world. Russia has always had a major stake in space exploration from the days of Sputnik in 1967. Over the past three decades, the European Union has developed its own highly advanced space program. Now Communist China has launched astronauts into space and has an ever more sophisticated space program developing including working on satellite killer vessels which could knock other countries’ spacecraft right out of the sky. Having become the third nation to independently launch men into space with a space station in the works and satellite missions to Mars and behind, China is well on its way to becoming a major force in outer space.
Japan and India are moving forward with ambitious space programs. While Japan has no current plans for ambitious manned space flight, they are aggressively moving into a wide range of scientific, research, and communications applications. India likewise has an ambitious satellite program including the ability to deploy multiple satellites from one launch and placing spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit. Indian manned space missions could come as soon as 2014-15.
These are examples of countries using rocket technology toward those enterprises we consider the noble exploit of space exploration; however, as the United States and Soviet Union were fully engaged in pursuing, these same technologies are the basis of their arms race as well. Both North Korea and Iran, two of the most dangerous nations on the planet have ambitious rocket programs. Nothing good can come from them being able to launch craft into orbit but it makes their ability to develop an ICBM program capable of launching nuclear missiles a certainty.
Has our nation become so complacent that we no longer appreciate why our leadership in the space race was so important in the first place?
Our nation was so shocked and terrified when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik on October 4, 1957 then quickly launched a second satellite only weeks later on November 3, 1957. Quickly, American found itself caught off-guard and there was a mad clamor to boost America’s commitment to science and technology education. Amidst numerous failures, the United States first satellite, Explorer 1, atop a Juno 1 rocket, that was a beefed up Redstone rocket, a larger and beefed up missile developed from the German V-2. It was hardly a significant space worthy rocket, launched from Cape Canaveral 52 years ago, on February 1, 1958.
America scurried about to get a meaningful space program going while the Soviets marched on , Yuri Gagarin was launched on Vostok 1 on April 12, 1961. America’s first launch would come just days later on May 5, but Freedom 7’s flight was only a suborbital short flight up and down for Alan Shepherd while the Soviets already accomplished orbit. The first US flight, Friendship 7 would come the following year on February 20, 1962.
Through the rest of the decade, the United States gained the lead in space it would never surrender resulting in man’s landing on the moon by July, 1969, but quickly our ambitions soured and our nation became to rest on its laurels. For four decades from the 1970’s to right now, no nation has gone beyond our level of accomplishment, but now it’s just a matter of time.
Remember this date, February 1, 2010, 52 to years to the date after America’s first successful satellite launch, our President destroyed our celestial vision of going where no one has gone before to wallow in meaningless sidesteps while our vision goes blind and our march to the future retreats.
Today marks a huge turning point in world history. Few will recognize it today, but what will it take for us to recognize what’s at stake?
We’re only months away from when Iran will have successfully tested its first nuclear weapon. They’re working on bigger and more powerful missiles. The time is coming soon when they will be able to place nuclear warheads atop missiles. Which reminds us: President Obama already opted to curtail an anti-missile program which would stage intercept missiles in Poland.
Scientific advancement and national defense go hand-in-hand. Each one supports the other. In a dangerous world with Islamic extremism sworn to destroy us, with energy and environmental needs we cannot successfully address, our nation’s ability to visualize our purpose in preparing for the future and committing the resources to do so have been severely clouded by myopic vision too stuck on the immediate here and now.
Bold dreams and giant steps are what the American Dream is made of. It’s time to dare to dream again lest our current Obama nightmare continue.
When Discovery touches down at the end of its mission, that’s it, the end of manned space missions from the United States. What started with great fanfare with Alan Shepherd’s first flight in May of 1961 will evaporate with a whimper almost 50 years later. Considering the last lunar mission was in December, 1972, most of the fireworks all took place in the first twelve years of the program. While surely a space station in continuous operation has its scientific and technological merit, it is a far cry from that which we are capable of developing. Further, considering that which was originally planned and how much has been compromised, the station is only a glimmer of what could have been.
With the Obama administration not funding Project Constellation and the Ares Rocket program which just recently launched its first test missile, all manned space efforts on the part of NASA will be over with no provisions to go further. Constellation was the mission to guide us into the future with earth orbit and lunar missions in the planning stages to set the stage for bolder missions beyond.
Now what is there to look forward to? With the delivery of the huge volumes of the trillions of dollars in the proposed Federal Budget, a conspicuous devil in the details was waving the white flag and surrendering America’s lead as the premier space program in the world. Russia has always had a major stake in space exploration from the days of Sputnik in 1967. Over the past three decades, the European Union has developed its own highly advanced space program. Now Communist China has launched astronauts into space and has an ever more sophisticated space program developing including working on satellite killer vessels which could knock other countries’ spacecraft right out of the sky. Having become the third nation to independently launch men into space with a space station in the works and satellite missions to Mars and behind, China is well on its way to becoming a major force in outer space.
Japan and India are moving forward with ambitious space programs. While Japan has no current plans for ambitious manned space flight, they are aggressively moving into a wide range of scientific, research, and communications applications. India likewise has an ambitious satellite program including the ability to deploy multiple satellites from one launch and placing spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit. Indian manned space missions could come as soon as 2014-15.
These are examples of countries using rocket technology toward those enterprises we consider the noble exploit of space exploration; however, as the United States and Soviet Union were fully engaged in pursuing, these same technologies are the basis of their arms race as well. Both North Korea and Iran, two of the most dangerous nations on the planet have ambitious rocket programs. Nothing good can come from them being able to launch craft into orbit but it makes their ability to develop an ICBM program capable of launching nuclear missiles a certainty.
Has our nation become so complacent that we no longer appreciate why our leadership in the space race was so important in the first place?
Our nation was so shocked and terrified when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik on October 4, 1957 then quickly launched a second satellite only weeks later on November 3, 1957. Quickly, American found itself caught off-guard and there was a mad clamor to boost America’s commitment to science and technology education. Amidst numerous failures, the United States first satellite, Explorer 1, atop a Juno 1 rocket, that was a beefed up Redstone rocket, a larger and beefed up missile developed from the German V-2. It was hardly a significant space worthy rocket, launched from Cape Canaveral 52 years ago, on February 1, 1958.
America scurried about to get a meaningful space program going while the Soviets marched on , Yuri Gagarin was launched on Vostok 1 on April 12, 1961. America’s first launch would come just days later on May 5, but Freedom 7’s flight was only a suborbital short flight up and down for Alan Shepherd while the Soviets already accomplished orbit. The first US flight, Friendship 7 would come the following year on February 20, 1962.
Through the rest of the decade, the United States gained the lead in space it would never surrender resulting in man’s landing on the moon by July, 1969, but quickly our ambitions soured and our nation became to rest on its laurels. For four decades from the 1970’s to right now, no nation has gone beyond our level of accomplishment, but now it’s just a matter of time.
Remember this date, February 1, 2010, 52 to years to the date after America’s first successful satellite launch, our President destroyed our celestial vision of going where no one has gone before to wallow in meaningless sidesteps while our vision goes blind and our march to the future retreats.
Today marks a huge turning point in world history. Few will recognize it today, but what will it take for us to recognize what’s at stake?
We’re only months away from when Iran will have successfully tested its first nuclear weapon. They’re working on bigger and more powerful missiles. The time is coming soon when they will be able to place nuclear warheads atop missiles. Which reminds us: President Obama already opted to curtail an anti-missile program which would stage intercept missiles in Poland.
Scientific advancement and national defense go hand-in-hand. Each one supports the other. In a dangerous world with Islamic extremism sworn to destroy us, with energy and environmental needs we cannot successfully address, our nation’s ability to visualize our purpose in preparing for the future and committing the resources to do so have been severely clouded by myopic vision too stuck on the immediate here and now.
Bold dreams and giant steps are what the American Dream is made of. It’s time to dare to dream again lest our current Obama nightmare continue.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Laptops for Student Athletes -- GOOD MOVE!!!

x
The Chronicle of Higher Education reports intercollegiate at the University of South Florida will be provided laptop computers because their athletic director noted their team travels more miles than any other team in a Bowl Championship conference.
x
USF will loan out 461 13" Macbook Pro laptops at a cost of $175,000 annually for the whole program. This would not be limited to the glamour sports of men's' football and basketball but for all sports requiring travel to compete. Given that most Big East teams are either deep in the Appalachian Mountains or above the Potomac River, the distance from South Florida to the North East is substantial. A wide range of technological opportunities are ready for their use.
x
Though the price tag might look substantial, there are grants and foundations that help defer the cost. We applaud the university's decision because the student part of student athlete is way too often overlooked.
x
College sports is big business. Fans and the media relate to football and basketball teams with the same intensity as for the pros. Players are criticized and ripped to pieces in the same manner as if they were established pros pulling in six figure or greater salaries. While they certainly aren't just ordinary college kids, they are STUDENT athletes. The extent to which the academic aspect of their college tenure is ignored can be appalling. Examining the graduation rates of some top Division I programs presents an unacceptable picture of these great institutions failing their students. For every student who does not graduate to go on to a professional career, how many leave having attended college and played a major sport and have no marketable credentials to show for it?
x
While many sports fans follow big college football and basketball, and on some campuses baseball and lacrosse attracts substantial fan support, the vast majority of NCAA athletes are in sports most fans never notice outside of the Olympics: swimming, wrestling, track & field, golf, and various winter sports. While not in the spotlight, largely out of sight and out of mind, these competitors have substantial travel commitments as well.
x
Providing students with the appropriate technology which in some cases could even allow them to participate in lecture classes streamed across the Internet represents a great opportunity to help make the educational component of these students' needs.
x
Perhaps there are even marketing opportunities for the technology companies to contribute equipment and get a commercial plug in. The days of "Hewlett Packard the official computer company of the PAC 10" might be close at hand. College sports are already so totally commercialized. Let's see that factor be turned into a positive for the STUDENT athletes.
x
Friday, August 28, 2009
Paving the Way for Premier Obama: Chilling Measure Proposed on Control of Internet

No one can deny the Internet has become so essential to day-to-day life and the conduct of commerce that cyberthreats could be a dreadful threat to national security, but how to secure the net and what authority should be involved demands careful study and debate.
Matt Drudge has posted a report on how not to do it. Sadly, some members of the Republican party have shown their knowledge and use of modern technology sadly limited. Howard Dean showed the way of what an effective tool the Internet can be and left-wing hate groups like MoveOn.org have been exploiting it ever since.
Still, the CNet article posted by Drudge deserves careful consideration especially after recent abuses such as a dedicated White House email address for citizens to report "fishy" opinions and their use of spam to spread their messagae. Given Obama has the least amount of tolerance for opposition of any recent American President short of Richard Nixon, we should all be scared...very scared.
Please read this article:
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Those #@$#!@#v Email Chains and Hoaxes

Educated pool of email correspondents.
x
What a wonder it is how using the Internet and email has transformed our lives since the middle of the last decade. Entire retail markets have been completely made over with the convenience and wide selection on-line ordering provides. The typical shopping mall book and record stores have become obsolete because they cannot possibly offer the selection of on-line retailers like Barnes & Noble and Amazon.com. Email affords us the opportunity to stay in touch with people we’d typically lose touch with through the years. We have new resources and forums to explore our hobbies and interests like never before. Given the ability to provide timely information, conventional magazines and newspapers are rapidly becoming obsolete. Given the ability to update information without having to reprint or reissue volumes of print on paper, timely, up-to-date information is available on almost all subjects.
Sadly, such technology has its unintended consequences too. Computer viruses wreak havoc with day-to-day computer use. Criminals have devised high-tech methods of stealing fortunes through scams, identity thefts, and other schemes. Social networking sites and chat rooms provide a forum where the real scum of the earth, child molesters and sex perverts can attract their prey. There are many less dangerous but highly annoying uses as well. Just as our old fashioned mail is littered with junk, so are our email accounts if we’re not careful, but then there is the curious phenomenon of the Internet and email hoax where outrageous claims and rumors run wild with otherwise intelligent people serving as unknowing dupes to spread such idiocy in ever increasing multiples as the tree of forwarded messages branch out from originator through layers of dupes to the inboxes of millions of email users.
We all have good intentioned friends and relatives who cannot resist the temptation to forward any tidbit which portends to tell us something we really need to know and thank goodness somebody is smart and good enough to take it upon himself or herself to take up the cause and use the new media to spread the word. Isn’t it funny how before there was email, such people would never cut an article out of a newspaper or magazine, duplicate it, and mail it to everyone he or she knows who might even remotely be affected by the subject. Likewise, these same people would never pick up the phone and call friends or relatives if they saw something on television or heard something on radio they thought might concern the folks they know. In fact, even with the ease of forwarding articles from legitimate news sources or being able to cut and paste content and send it on to others, these same folk would never even do that. However, when somebody forwards them something which is something that was probably forwarded to the sender from whom they got it that was forwarded to that person from another sender and who ultimately knows how many times the message has been forwarded or who originated it, but somehow, when something is sent someone rather than when someone finds out something about an issue on his or her own, these souls seem to feel some kind of moral imperative to send it on and in some way pat themselves on the back feeling good that they have done their good deed for the day.
The sad truth is, they’ve been duped into functioning as mindless assholes since almost all these forwarded messages are pure bullshit. Amazingly, as widespread and annoying as these forwarded pack of lies and deception are, those who originate them are never identified nor has anyone profiled the most likely source of where they come from, though we would suspect bored college students whose brains have been severely compromised by large amounts of marijuana and beer consumption. That’s just our guess.
The phenomenon is fascinating. We all remember the childhood tale of Chicken Little. Chicken Little was little more than a dumb cluck, a fowl minded creature who was struck by an acorn falling from a tree. Not being a particularly bright being, Chicken Little assumed the sky is falling. Oh my God, the headless horsemen have risen, Armageddon is upon us. Somebody has to tell the king or the President of the United States, Oprah Winfrey or Doctor Phil for that matter, somebody who is an appropriate all knowing authority who might be able to do something about it. Soon Chicken Little addresses her concern with Ducky Lucky. They band together to alert Goosey Lucy, Jerky Turkey, and even Sagacious Swan!!! Little of value can be learned from this childhood tale other than there sure are a lot of impressionable dumb clucks, and the analogy certainly seems apropos in the email forwarding phenomenon.
Don’t you want to belt somebody in the mouth when you read some highly emotive screed about something everybody’s supposed to care about and then at the end of the message it implores you to forward the message to everyone you know. Of course some of them are prayers, so God might not be too happy if you don’t forward His message or might grant you a miracle for forwarding some cheesy little message of hope whose sentiments are so sappy it could drive the most devote Christian to renounce his faith.
Who wouldn’t want to help a dying child? Is there anyone with an email account who didn’t get a plea on the behalf of some poor elementary school girl dying of incurable cancer who wrote some sappy poem about world peace and her dying wish was to be entered in the Guinness Book of World Records for posting the most email forwards ever. On top of that, of course, Bill Gates would contribute .02 of a penny for each forward for medical research to help this poor kid. Of course, the truth is, there is no such kid. There is no technology that monitors and tallies the number of email forwards, and Bill Gates has nothing to do with this. When I get this email, if there is a chain of many forwards, I feel so tempted to back forward it with a message that says, “Fuck you, I hope this nonexistent little bitch dies!!”
In August of 2003, Mars made its closest pass to the earth since Neanderthals walked the earth. Prior to that eventful August eve, all kinds of emails made the rounds that the results would be so spectacular that the light from Mars would be as bright as a full moon. Duh! The moon is just a 384,403 km little jog from earth and being part of earth’s orbit around the sun is closer to the sun than the red planet. Given the moon is that close and is about one quarter the diameter of its mother planet, the moon would always be significantly brighter than Mars even in its closest pass to earth. Mars is about half the diameter of earth. Even at the closest approach to earth, Mars is 35 million miles. Mars reaches its closest distance to earth every two years, but other factors make each close pass a little closer or further year to year, but the number of miles distance from a close year to a far year is relatively insignificant and barely perceivable on earth.
Nevertheless, as every August approaches, most of us will get an idiot email consisting of the following:
"The Red Planet is about to be spectacular."
"Earth is catching up with Mars [for] the closest approach between the two planets in recorded history."
"On August 27th … Mars will look as large as the full moon."
And finally, "NO ONE ALIVE TODAY WILL EVER SEE THIS AGAIN."
Yeah right! We presume the folks who believe this have also received tips on a great real estate offer for ocean front property near Hagerstown, Maryland too.
P.T. Barnum was correct. Suckers are born every nanosecond thanks to cyberspace. Still, how is it generally intelligent people can so quickly be duped into behaving like Chicken Little so easily.
Let’s make it clear. We cannot trust the news media for its bias, why would we trust anonymous email forwards?
Sure as we lament this situation, before most people read this, many of us will receive another, “You must forward this prayer for peace or the world will succumb to swarms of locusts if the chain is broken – and it would be YOUR fault for breaking the chain” type of email. Others will be implored to collect pull tabs from soda cans to help some sick kid get in the Guinness Book before dropping dead. Others will be tipped off that a mixture of baking soda, Swedish vodka, and grapefruit juice will make a person immune to the swine flu. Think of the most outrageous possibility and it’s surely coming to an inbox near you.
The challenge is dealing with our friends and relatives who despite much coaching still continue to annoy us with this insidious bullshit. Yes, we love them and they mean well, but we all know what paves the road to hell.
Sadly, such technology has its unintended consequences too. Computer viruses wreak havoc with day-to-day computer use. Criminals have devised high-tech methods of stealing fortunes through scams, identity thefts, and other schemes. Social networking sites and chat rooms provide a forum where the real scum of the earth, child molesters and sex perverts can attract their prey. There are many less dangerous but highly annoying uses as well. Just as our old fashioned mail is littered with junk, so are our email accounts if we’re not careful, but then there is the curious phenomenon of the Internet and email hoax where outrageous claims and rumors run wild with otherwise intelligent people serving as unknowing dupes to spread such idiocy in ever increasing multiples as the tree of forwarded messages branch out from originator through layers of dupes to the inboxes of millions of email users.
We all have good intentioned friends and relatives who cannot resist the temptation to forward any tidbit which portends to tell us something we really need to know and thank goodness somebody is smart and good enough to take it upon himself or herself to take up the cause and use the new media to spread the word. Isn’t it funny how before there was email, such people would never cut an article out of a newspaper or magazine, duplicate it, and mail it to everyone he or she knows who might even remotely be affected by the subject. Likewise, these same people would never pick up the phone and call friends or relatives if they saw something on television or heard something on radio they thought might concern the folks they know. In fact, even with the ease of forwarding articles from legitimate news sources or being able to cut and paste content and send it on to others, these same folk would never even do that. However, when somebody forwards them something which is something that was probably forwarded to the sender from whom they got it that was forwarded to that person from another sender and who ultimately knows how many times the message has been forwarded or who originated it, but somehow, when something is sent someone rather than when someone finds out something about an issue on his or her own, these souls seem to feel some kind of moral imperative to send it on and in some way pat themselves on the back feeling good that they have done their good deed for the day.
The sad truth is, they’ve been duped into functioning as mindless assholes since almost all these forwarded messages are pure bullshit. Amazingly, as widespread and annoying as these forwarded pack of lies and deception are, those who originate them are never identified nor has anyone profiled the most likely source of where they come from, though we would suspect bored college students whose brains have been severely compromised by large amounts of marijuana and beer consumption. That’s just our guess.
The phenomenon is fascinating. We all remember the childhood tale of Chicken Little. Chicken Little was little more than a dumb cluck, a fowl minded creature who was struck by an acorn falling from a tree. Not being a particularly bright being, Chicken Little assumed the sky is falling. Oh my God, the headless horsemen have risen, Armageddon is upon us. Somebody has to tell the king or the President of the United States, Oprah Winfrey or Doctor Phil for that matter, somebody who is an appropriate all knowing authority who might be able to do something about it. Soon Chicken Little addresses her concern with Ducky Lucky. They band together to alert Goosey Lucy, Jerky Turkey, and even Sagacious Swan!!! Little of value can be learned from this childhood tale other than there sure are a lot of impressionable dumb clucks, and the analogy certainly seems apropos in the email forwarding phenomenon.
Don’t you want to belt somebody in the mouth when you read some highly emotive screed about something everybody’s supposed to care about and then at the end of the message it implores you to forward the message to everyone you know. Of course some of them are prayers, so God might not be too happy if you don’t forward His message or might grant you a miracle for forwarding some cheesy little message of hope whose sentiments are so sappy it could drive the most devote Christian to renounce his faith.
Who wouldn’t want to help a dying child? Is there anyone with an email account who didn’t get a plea on the behalf of some poor elementary school girl dying of incurable cancer who wrote some sappy poem about world peace and her dying wish was to be entered in the Guinness Book of World Records for posting the most email forwards ever. On top of that, of course, Bill Gates would contribute .02 of a penny for each forward for medical research to help this poor kid. Of course, the truth is, there is no such kid. There is no technology that monitors and tallies the number of email forwards, and Bill Gates has nothing to do with this. When I get this email, if there is a chain of many forwards, I feel so tempted to back forward it with a message that says, “Fuck you, I hope this nonexistent little bitch dies!!”
In August of 2003, Mars made its closest pass to the earth since Neanderthals walked the earth. Prior to that eventful August eve, all kinds of emails made the rounds that the results would be so spectacular that the light from Mars would be as bright as a full moon. Duh! The moon is just a 384,403 km little jog from earth and being part of earth’s orbit around the sun is closer to the sun than the red planet. Given the moon is that close and is about one quarter the diameter of its mother planet, the moon would always be significantly brighter than Mars even in its closest pass to earth. Mars is about half the diameter of earth. Even at the closest approach to earth, Mars is 35 million miles. Mars reaches its closest distance to earth every two years, but other factors make each close pass a little closer or further year to year, but the number of miles distance from a close year to a far year is relatively insignificant and barely perceivable on earth.
Nevertheless, as every August approaches, most of us will get an idiot email consisting of the following:
"The Red Planet is about to be spectacular."
"Earth is catching up with Mars [for] the closest approach between the two planets in recorded history."
"On August 27th … Mars will look as large as the full moon."
And finally, "NO ONE ALIVE TODAY WILL EVER SEE THIS AGAIN."
Yeah right! We presume the folks who believe this have also received tips on a great real estate offer for ocean front property near Hagerstown, Maryland too.
P.T. Barnum was correct. Suckers are born every nanosecond thanks to cyberspace. Still, how is it generally intelligent people can so quickly be duped into behaving like Chicken Little so easily.
Let’s make it clear. We cannot trust the news media for its bias, why would we trust anonymous email forwards?
Sure as we lament this situation, before most people read this, many of us will receive another, “You must forward this prayer for peace or the world will succumb to swarms of locusts if the chain is broken – and it would be YOUR fault for breaking the chain” type of email. Others will be implored to collect pull tabs from soda cans to help some sick kid get in the Guinness Book before dropping dead. Others will be tipped off that a mixture of baking soda, Swedish vodka, and grapefruit juice will make a person immune to the swine flu. Think of the most outrageous possibility and it’s surely coming to an inbox near you.
The challenge is dealing with our friends and relatives who despite much coaching still continue to annoy us with this insidious bullshit. Yes, we love them and they mean well, but we all know what paves the road to hell.
Be sure to forward this post to twelve of your closest friends and family or you will develop a painful rectal itch which responds to no known medication. Get the message!?!?!?
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
VIRUS INFECTION

Greetings esteemed readers. I apologize for not writing sooner such as my weekly Sprint Cup Preview, serving as a senior officer in the people's militia to lead the insurrection against the tyranny of Obama-nation, and to generally be the enlighted arbitrator of the truth, defender of logic, senior sports commentator for the Chesapeake region, and cultural affairs correspondent, my humble thoughts have not made it into print thanks to a malicious computer virus attack which absolutely wiped out the operating system on my trustworthy laptop. What appeared to be an email from a beloved nephew turned out to be an insanely corruptive virus which began as a virus alert, direct to some bogus anti-virus software site, shut down all kinds of tools including Task Manager, Display Properties, most of Control Panel, and just about anything else that could be used to clean up the mess.
As such, I have been relegated to the joys of virus eradication, several attempts at reinstalling windows in progressive degrees of installation from fix to major install (at least I didn't have to reformat the hard drive), then loading all kinds of software, moving files and directories, and all kinds of little tweaks. Aside from relocating "my documents" and installing that pain-in-the-ass iTunes and Quick Time players then having to reset the defaults to the proper media player, it looks like I'm almost finished. I was greatly relieved when I found my address book and previous emails all remained in good shape. Now stinking Outlook still needs some tweaking.
All this leads me to the conclusion that waterboarding would be a perfectly legitimate punishment for anyone creating a virus or purposely spreading viruses to others' computers.
What kind of sick, evil mind would create such things? Is this high-tech vandalism or something more sinister? I could see a mindset among anarchists (scum of the earth losers if there ever were ones) or terrorists who would gain some victory in trashing the communication tools of corporate America, but what about the viruses that are just designed to mess up just regular folks' machines? Are these alienated pimple faced nerds who are ignored by all the lovely girls in their class but they suffer from guilt fearing what they learned from mom and dad (if they have dads) that masturbation can cause horrible side effects like hair growing on their palms who might have been bullied one time too many? Are they just inexcusible shitheads? Are they actually created by folks who work for Norton and McAfee to make their cheesy products necessary? WHO KNOWS? STRAP 'EM TO THE BOARD AND BRING ON THE HOT SALT WATER.
There is nothing acceptible about their behavior and they deserve multiple levels of pain in direct proportion to the problems they've caused others, the BASTARDS.
Friday, February 13, 2009
More on "The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008"

We recently reported on an issue raised by former Assistant Secretary for Post Secondary Education, Diane Auer Jones found in The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HR 4137). All institutions of higher education that provide student housing must now report students who are vacant from their dorm space for 24 hours or more as missing. We decided to take a look at this legislation for more outrages. First, this measure was buried deep in Section 488. However, the total measure consists of 431 pages of gobblety-goop micromanaging virtually all aspect of higher education other than explicity addressing cirriculum or tenure.
This shameful prime example of legislative excess was established simply to provide federal support for helping low and moderate income students attend college but in doing so tramples on virtually every square foot of every college campus.
What struck us as most concerning about this law is the depth and range Federal regulation extends its grasp upon how colleges and universities conduct their business simply as the strings attached for the schools accepting students who receive Federal loans or other measures of Federal funding.
Read all about it if you have too much time on your hands or have a real fetish for reading about government abuse. Do you think any of our elected "leaders" read this whole measure. Here it is courtesy of govtrack.us.
These provisions are unbelievably specific in some instances and require tremendous resources to impliment, monitor, assure compliance, and report upon. As such, the overhead to the schools is enormous from having adequate legal counsel either on staff or contracted to interpret the legislation and make sure the school is compliant in every aspect. On top of that, the manpower and resource requirements to manage these requirements is substantial. On top of that, just by the size of the task load imposed by this law, so much administrative and leadership time is devoted to simply following this ridiculous work of bureaucratic interference run wild instead of focusing on the key issues that all schools should be devoted to promoting: quality education and a good learning environment for students; expert, timely, creative, and far-reaching research for the benefit of society, business and industry; and recruiting, developing, and retaining the best, most challenging faculty possible.
Is it any wonder that college costs have gone up so dramtically in the past 30 years far beyond the rate of inflation by multiple factors? Likewise, is it also not surprising that the college environment is being overtaken by personnel on all levels who have no problem with a big government approach to all aspects of the human condition. Is it any coincidence that college faculties have become the bastion of extreme left politics conservatives or those with traditional values need not apply.
American leadership has had quality higher education as one of its key foundations where our institutions of higher education were sought by the best and brightest around the world for their studies. Today, the product is increasingly being compromised, losing its sense of mission, and beginning to lose its lead over what is provided in other countries.
Our colleges and universities must be the best the world has to offer in providing expertise in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics while continuing to provide an outstanding liberal arts education where schooling is not so much as learning the right answers for some master exam but asking the right questions about life in the real world.
Sadly, our great institutions are being reduced to essentially vocational traning facillities where every "i" is dotted and "t" crossed with fervent political correctness blindly complying with the multitude of overregulation by the Federal Government.
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Michigan Metal

Retro-styling or hard reality? Which car best represents the future of the United States automotive industry?I saw a new Mustang GT convertible on the parking lot today. What a beautiful car, its styling sleek and stylish. One could think of the original Mustang of 1964 and its descendents until the Mustang mystique was squeezed into a Pinto body as the Mustang II in 1974. Although it still looked like a Mustang in many respects, everything about it was a jazzed up Pinto, and folks have said something about putting lipstick on a pig?
Michigan’s unemployment rate is over 10%. Things aren’t much better in Indiana and Ohio, two states with a heavy interest in the automotive industry. Through out the country, automotive factories have closed down. Here in Baltimore, the Chevy plant died when GM discontinued the Astro van, but the writing was on the wall when they stopped making the midsized cars of yesteryear when beautiful Malibu’s, GTO’s, Cutlass’s, and Buick Century’s rolled off the assembly line.
Your writer was born in 1953. I was a very little boy when I was first blown away by Michigan Metal, our neighbor had just purchased a white 1957 Ford Fairlane 500 convertible with a red interior. They said it had a Thunderbird engine. A few years later the doctor who lived across the street got a giant Chrysler 300 convertible then a 1963 Corvette Stringray, the one with the split rear window. By the time I was in 6th grade, I loved building car models. My model building started with the 1964 automotive year and continued through 1968. In ’66 to ’67, I built every single model that AMT and another supplier had that represented everything from a Ford Falcon to Chrysler Imperial. I subscribed to both Motor Trend and Hot Rod going crazy over the sneak previews of the next year’s autos. Each summer, I went to Pontiac, Michigan where my grandparents lived. How I loved the trips to the Pontiac plant where they build both full-sized and mid-sized Pontiacs, such beautiful cars in the mid 60’s and Dearborn where Ford assembled the Mustang and Cougar. If we were out there too late for that model year, the plants would be closed, but we’d see the haulers out on the Ohio and Pennsylvania turnpike rolling the new cars for the next fall east. Though they tried to cover them with tarps, we could get glimpses of the front and rear styling and occasionally the side sheet metal. A lesson in Michigan geography was a lesson in the General Motors product line. Flint was the home of Buick and some Chevrolets. Lansing was the home of Oldsmobile. Detroit built Cadillac’s and Chevrolets. Guess what they built in Pontiac? Well, they also built some GMC trucks and buses. Dearborn was synonymous with Ford. There was also the city with in the city, Hamtramck, where Chryslers were built by a largely Polish ethnic community.
Latee ach September, my father and I would start off a Saturday morning at the start of the big north Baltimore commercial drag, York Road, work our way down into Towson stopping at every dealer. We had them all except Cadillac which only had two dealerships in the Baltimore area. My dad would scold me not to get too excited at the Chevy dealer, but it was okay to drool over the Corvette. He was a Ford man through and through. He only bought two cars that weren’t Fords or Mercury’s my whole life, a Morris Minor as the family’s first second car. Lots of people were getting Volkswagen’s but he’d have no part of that. Briefly, he had a 1966 Oldsmobile Jetstar 88’s, a beautiful car, that replaced the Morris Minor while mom was driving the second of two Ford Country Squire’s the deluxe mommy mobile of the era. The 1964 Squire was briefly my first car. I could fit the whole gang in it, and for a buck’s contribution from some of the passengers we could drive forever with gas at $ .27 a gallon even though that big steel machine got around 14 mpg. From cars around 1955 to the early 1970’s, there were so many classics. Is there any young man even today who can’t recognize an original Thurnderbird or 57 Chevy?
In 1971, Chevrolet introduced the Vega and Ford introduced the Pinto. How could we have ever known that these stinking little “subcompacts” were the first signs of the decline of the American automotive industry? They were priced to obliterate the Volkswagen Beetle and there were a few little Toyotas and Datsuns starting to show up around town. The midsized cars were becoming the most interesting cars. Meanwhile, the full-sized cars were getting so large and bloated and the revision of the “pony cars” lost the simple beauty of the originals. Gas mileage didn’t matter when gas was below $.30 a gallon.
Washington started to have its say in the late 60’s but most of the original regulations made sense. The 1965 Corvair was a lovely looking little compact car, but Ralph Nader came out with “Unsafe at Any Speed” showing what the news media failed to cover. They were bombs on wheels with the gas tank in front of the passenger where there was no protection given it was a rear engine car. Likewise, cars had no pollution controls and those who can remember driving along the major expressways in urban areas particularly in the industrial parts of down, the air pollution was choking even smarting the eyes.
Nobody saw it coming unless traveling in the Middle East, but the unthinkable happened in 1974 when the surrounding Arab states invaded Israel only to be defeated horribly with Israel taking territory from the surrounding countries in response to create a little safety zone, but the Arabs realized the power they had was their oil. They could punish Western nations who supported Israel but cutting off the oil supply. Over night, gas prices skyrocketed, and gas was in short supply. Gas lines extended for blocks on every major street in America. Some states rationed gas and began lowering speed limits. The Feds responded by lowering the national speed limit to a measly 55 mph, a measure few citizens obeyed and eventually common sense would set in and the law was revoked. The government started setting mileage standards for the auto industry. Detroit responded by bringing out new smaller cars and downsizing existing models. Suddenly, the Pinto and Vega were in high demand, but as more people drove them, the obvious was clear, they were terrible cars in every respect. Vega engines had an awkward problem of blowing up, but worse, Pintos would explode when rear-ended. In 1977, General Motors downsized its full-sized cars for the first time. All of a sudden, everything from a Chevrolet Impala or Caprice to Buick LeSabre were shorter and narrower than their midsized counterparts. Even the elegant Cadillac DeVille got shortened. GM then downsized its midsized fleet. What was the hottest selling car in Detroit, the Olds Cutlass Supreme, was miniaturized into a faint shadow of its former self. From Malibu’s to Century’s the code word was BORING, but they were also cheap, shoddy pieces of junk. Not to be outdone, Ford responded with the introduction of the Ford Fairmont and Mercury Zephyr, and downsizing the LTD, Mercury Marquis, and all Lincolns. Their midsized line became totally ambiguous as familiar lines vanished and failed to stabilize until Ford finally got it right for many years with the awkward looking, bar of soap cars, the Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable.
Almost overnight in the mid-70’s, Datsuns, Toyotas, and Hondas were every where. The ultimate of cheap, but a very high quality cheap, was the Honda Civic. Quickly, Toyota Corollas, Honda Accords, and Datsun 510’s were everywhere. One of the sexiest cars on the market was the Datsun 240Z. As model confusion and crappy quality dogged the mainstream domestic midsized market, the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord became the most popular cars in the country.
Somehow, despite all that happened. Detroit never got the message. Chrysler was mortally wounded but somehow sprung back with Federal loans and Lee Iacocca’s vision. Ford seemed to stay a little ahead of the curve in the late 80’s and early 90’s. It would be hard to notice due to their largesse, but General Motors was perhaps the most self-destructive of all. Can anyone remember the second round of downsizing of the Cadillac Deville? How sad. They had almost none of the traditional Cadillac elegance, but by 1991 they were able to cosmetically restore it to something that was worthy of the Cadillac crest. Many cars had wretch paint jobs that would start to oxidize after months. Quality issues and design defects by all three automakers were so widespread that almost any American car buyer could expect at least one or two recall notices. American Motors quickly folded and became part of Chrysler, but they had one product that would be a huge influence on Detroit’s future, the Cherokee.
Somehow, despite gas going as high as around $1.50 in 1979, the 80’s, 90’s and into the new millennium saws relatively cheap gas with only minor spikes in fuel costs such as during the first Gulf War. In 1991, Ford saw the potential of the Jeep Cherokee ditching its small sized Bronco II and introducing the Ford Explorer. Soon the Mini-Van, Detroit’s economical answer to replacing the mommy-mobile station wagons were obsolete as the mid-sized SUV took off like gangbusters. Eventually, even Lincoln and Cadillac would be in the SUV market with models based on their company’s Ford and Chevy large SUV’s based on the fullp-sized pickup chassis. Meanwhile, all of a sudden, even yuppies needed full-sized pickup trucks.
The Detroit cash registers were starting to ring again, but General Motors and Chrysler were still failing. The Japanese automakers continued to encroach on market share while the Korean Hyundai became mainstream and soon the KIA would follow.
Surprisingly, by the late 90’s, Ford and General Motors were actually building darned good cars. Their quality rivaled their Japanese counterparts, but car buyers had lost interest. Many baby boomers hit car buying age right as the downsizing fiasco started in the 1970’s and became accustomed to Japanese cars right away. Boomers didn’t feel the prejudice against Japanese cars as those manufacturers had built the weapons of war that killed thousands of American soldiers in the Pacific in World War II.
However, the glow of Michigan Metal had other factors causing it to rust away into dust. Through out the 60’s and 70’s, times were good. An auto industry strike against one of the big three could cost vital market share against its competition. Detroit had no sense of what the future could or would bring never realizing that even if everything continued rosy, they were building a model that was unsustainable in legacy costs. Auto workers were given incredible pension and benefits for life. The obligation on such costs were enormous and would escalate as the employees from the “Great” generation retired and the baby boomers settled in, but what would happen when the boomers started to retire?
Detroit’s workforce has contracted enormously since the 1970’s. Entire cities in the rust belt are essentially ghost towns in 2009. Flint, Michigan as one example, is a virtual wasteland. Here in Chesapeake country once proud factories in Baltimore, the famous “Chevy” plant, and Norfolk, the venerable Ford “F” series pickup are gone.
Nothing points to the changing face of the auto manufacturing landscape better than looking at NASCAR’s Sprint Cup. The body styles featured are the Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Impala, Dodge Charger, and Toyota Camry. Once the rules were American only, but they first had to bend a little when Dodge became a product of Daimler-Chrysler, then a German company. How could they keep Toyota’s fat bankroll out of the sport? Lots of good old boys were now driving Toyota pickups, and gulp, even full sized pickups as Toyota introduced its Tundra. Here’s the stark revelation. Look at where the cars are built. The Ford Fusion is built in Mexico, down in the land of drug lords and civil chaos. The Chevrolet Impala and Dodge Charger are built on the north shore of Lake Ontario near Toronto in Canada. The most American of all, the Toyota Campy built in Kentucky and Indiana!
The recent upsurge in fuel costs doomed Detroit’s remaining cash cow, the SUV and pickup truck market. Look at how much Ford depended on that market as most of their automobiles seem destined to fleet sales, company cars and the rental industry. Ford still builds the Crown Victoria but none are available to everyday consumers. They are built exclusively for fleet sales, mostly as police cruisers. What’s the small town sheriff department to do that maybe only has one to five cars?
The legacy cost of each American car is huge, a differential Detroit has to overcome to compete head on with the Japanese and Korean vehicles. How unfair can it be for those already retired who counted on a stable pension as part of their career compensation who never gave a though of having to save for retirement given the promise of steady income now wondering what will happen if any of the big three should fold or the workers of today sellout their processors to hold on to their existing jobs. Almost certainly, they would get some support from the government, but not at the level they were promised.
Today, most parking lots are full of virtually indistinguishable cars as a Mercedes doesn’t look that different from a Hyundai, and Ford, Toyota, Chrysler, Honda, General Motors, Nissan, Volkswagen, and Kia vehicles all look so similar. How is it that so many cars now are painted shades of gray and what few colors are still available, red, blue, and green are such dark muted colors? BORING! Only the retro VW Beetle and a few other small cars dare to be colorful even to the point of late 60’s tackiness.
The days of September excitement are gone as cars change so little over the years and almost none of them have any flare for style. Give Chrysler credit for pretty bold styling for its newest incarnation of the Chrysler 300. Perhaps its huge grill is supposed to be a “retro” touch to the big Chryslers of old.
How perfect the new Mustangs look. They are cars of the new millennium in almost every respect, but so recognizable as Mustangs of old. They are beautiful cars. Dodge responded with its retro Challenger which is likewise so faithful to the original. Soon Chevrolet will do the same with the reintroduction of the Camaro which goes back to the original design, mostly after the first body’s initial revision. All of these cars are so damned gorgeous, but all of them are essentially one or two passenger cars so as much as they fill a niche, they’re not the staple that cars like Impalas, Taurus’s, Malibu’s, Camry’s and Accord’s represent. The newest Camry is just plain ugly!
Are the new “pony” cars a glimpse of the potential the future could bring or just a little baby boomer sentimentality? Given what’s happened in Washington the last few months, one has to wonder as millions of taxpayer dollars have gone to General Motors and Chrysler just to meet their current expenses. So far, Ford avoided taking the dip, but all is not rosy in the land of the blue oval.
Government assistance means more government control, and given the recent energy price surge brought on demand for more fuel efficient standards and the current regime, the Democratic party, will surely seek pollution standards that will darn near demand emission perfection, Detroit’s ability to build quality, appealing cars will be further challenged while Toyota and Honda seem able to adjust at the snap of a finger.
It’s so easy to love the full-sized pickups and the pony cars, but is doing so living in the past? Given a camel is supposedly a horse designed by a government committee, we hate to think what Washington’s role in forging Michigan Metal could create. Given our seemingly irreversible march to socialism, the retro pony car could soon become a Trabant.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
Apollo 8: America's Christmas Rendezvous With the Moon 40 Years Later

Forty years ago this Christmas, astronauts Commander, Frank Borman, Command Module Pilot, James Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot, William Anders became the first men from earth to rendezvous on the moon as they orbited the moon for twenty hours on Christmas Eve and Christmas day of 1968. They were the first astronauts to ride atop the skyscraper sized Saturn IV booster whose third stage would reignite after achieving earth orbit to break from earth’s gravity and send the Apollo 8 Command Service Module (CSM) on a trajectory to the moon. Upon reaching the moon three days later, the CSM would fire its rocket engine to insert their spacecraft into lunar orbit. Soon humans would see terrestrial sights never viewed by mankind before as their space craft looped around the back side of the moon. While on the “dark” side of the moon, of course, radio signals could not reach earth creating a little bit of anxiety until all ground crew members were assured their mission had been executed properly.
While in orbit around the moon, Americans and people all around the world watched and listened in awe as the astronauts read the story of creation, the first ten verses of Genesis. For many, the spiritual experience was profound seeing the earth as never seen before while on the holiest day of the Christian faith our astronauts read the Biblical account of creation back to a world of anxious listeners.
As significant a landmark it was to see the far side of the moon for the first time, equally fascinating and far more stimulating was the sight of the earth getting smaller and smaller as the spacecraft approached the moon and then witnessing an “earth rise” with each orbit as the spacecraft came around from the dark side of the moon to the part of the moon visible to earth.
The mission was a huge success leading to two more test flights before Apollo 11 would land on the moon the following July. Many doubted if President John Kennedy’s mission to land a man on the moon by the end of the decade could ever be realized especially after three astronauts were incinerated atop a Saturn IB rocket their Apollo I spacecraft. The next 18 months, NASA scientists and engineers would work feverously to make up for lost time, correcting flaws in design eliminating the need for the astronauts to inhabit a 100% oxygen atmosphere in their space craft where the smallest spark, simply an electrical connection arcing over could cause a massive blaze.
Today, it’s hard to believe that it’s been four decades since man first rendezvoused with the moon and the last trip to the moon would be just four years later in December, 1972 with the launch of Apollo 17. The remaining CSM’s were used for Skylab missions and plans to build additional Saturn V boosters were cancelled. NASA’s budget was cut back to misery amounts as the manta as the Vietnam War wound down was that how could society spend money on space exploration when there are so many problems on earth. That led to the budget spacecraft which still flies today, the Space Shuttle, whose mission should conclude next year with hopes of Project Orion and possibly more moon missions after that.
While citizens criticize the space program for a variety of reasons, the benefits to society from our space missions are incalculable. Whether it’s powdered beverages like (yuck) Tang, Velcro, miniaturized television cameras and computers, and all kinds of technologies and electronics which would benefit everything from medical science to consumer products. The space program also had intangible benefits, giving the American people a chance to band together behind a common purpose continuing the pioneer spirit seeking to extend the known universe and knowledge base of humanity tremendously.
The memories of Christmas with Apollo 8 are hard to forget for baby boomers and their parents. It’s hard to believe two generations have largely passed since America’s missions to the moon. How hard it is to believe that children born on that fateful morning when the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded are almost 23 years old.
America needs the space program. The benefits are overwhelming in so many areas. Those who weren’t born or old enough to remember the space race and Project Apollo would learn much by studying those missions. The commitment to excellence, the “can do” thinking, and the clear dominance of American “know how” all could use a little bit of a recharge as 2009 approaches.
Let us use this historical window, the 40th anniversaries of the various lunar missions to stimulate learning and understanding of the wonders and benefits of space exploration. We should never take such bold accomplishments for granted.
While in orbit around the moon, Americans and people all around the world watched and listened in awe as the astronauts read the story of creation, the first ten verses of Genesis. For many, the spiritual experience was profound seeing the earth as never seen before while on the holiest day of the Christian faith our astronauts read the Biblical account of creation back to a world of anxious listeners.
As significant a landmark it was to see the far side of the moon for the first time, equally fascinating and far more stimulating was the sight of the earth getting smaller and smaller as the spacecraft approached the moon and then witnessing an “earth rise” with each orbit as the spacecraft came around from the dark side of the moon to the part of the moon visible to earth.
The mission was a huge success leading to two more test flights before Apollo 11 would land on the moon the following July. Many doubted if President John Kennedy’s mission to land a man on the moon by the end of the decade could ever be realized especially after three astronauts were incinerated atop a Saturn IB rocket their Apollo I spacecraft. The next 18 months, NASA scientists and engineers would work feverously to make up for lost time, correcting flaws in design eliminating the need for the astronauts to inhabit a 100% oxygen atmosphere in their space craft where the smallest spark, simply an electrical connection arcing over could cause a massive blaze.
Today, it’s hard to believe that it’s been four decades since man first rendezvoused with the moon and the last trip to the moon would be just four years later in December, 1972 with the launch of Apollo 17. The remaining CSM’s were used for Skylab missions and plans to build additional Saturn V boosters were cancelled. NASA’s budget was cut back to misery amounts as the manta as the Vietnam War wound down was that how could society spend money on space exploration when there are so many problems on earth. That led to the budget spacecraft which still flies today, the Space Shuttle, whose mission should conclude next year with hopes of Project Orion and possibly more moon missions after that.
While citizens criticize the space program for a variety of reasons, the benefits to society from our space missions are incalculable. Whether it’s powdered beverages like (yuck) Tang, Velcro, miniaturized television cameras and computers, and all kinds of technologies and electronics which would benefit everything from medical science to consumer products. The space program also had intangible benefits, giving the American people a chance to band together behind a common purpose continuing the pioneer spirit seeking to extend the known universe and knowledge base of humanity tremendously.
The memories of Christmas with Apollo 8 are hard to forget for baby boomers and their parents. It’s hard to believe two generations have largely passed since America’s missions to the moon. How hard it is to believe that children born on that fateful morning when the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded are almost 23 years old.
America needs the space program. The benefits are overwhelming in so many areas. Those who weren’t born or old enough to remember the space race and Project Apollo would learn much by studying those missions. The commitment to excellence, the “can do” thinking, and the clear dominance of American “know how” all could use a little bit of a recharge as 2009 approaches.
Let us use this historical window, the 40th anniversaries of the various lunar missions to stimulate learning and understanding of the wonders and benefits of space exploration. We should never take such bold accomplishments for granted.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Mind Blower: Living Proof Some Folks Have Too Much Time On Their Hands

1, 3, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97 .....
Remember those? Prime numbers, numbers that are indivisible except by themselves and one that cannot be factored down. The higher up the numerical scale, the less frequently prime numbers occur. That's all Math 101, and yes, 101 is a prime number too!
Thanks to Windows XP and a team of UCLA scientists they have now discovered a 13 million digit prime number!
Can you imagine how many sheets of paper it would take or how long it would take just to write down 13 million figures? If it takes one second per digit, that would be around 150 days around the clock!
If every digit were displayed at standard resolution, how many industry standard 17" computer displays would be needed to show all the figures?
Science is all about discovering new things, so let's celebrate this team at UCLA for their discovery. Now, who can explain how this discovery benefits the human condition except perhaps Microsoft can brag how air-tight its ability to calculate is. Remember the hoopla over the computation problems with the first generation Intel Pentium processors?
RMF is proud to have enabled his readers to be just a wee bit smarter on this rainy late September afternoon in Chesapeake Bay country. Given your humble writer was born in '53 and graduated from high school in '71, does that make him a PTP (Prime Time Player)? That might be stretching it!! Ah to be old enough to remember the days of the adding machine before the pocket calculator and the geeks still used slide rules in advanced math and science back then. Why do you think your writer here became a Liberal Arts student? Majoring in English and Philosophy and minoring in History worked out just fine for this fellow!!!
So when does one know, "I'm past my prime" anyway?
x
x
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Email Idiocy: False Bill Cosby Write-In Campaign
Do you get emails like these? Today it’s Bill Cosby. Yesterday it might have been Andy Rooney, John Riggins, Robin Williams or some other figure known for being outspoken. Just as there are tons of stale old jokes that have been in circulation for many years to the point where between seeing the same old same old so often and that in the era of political correctness, jokes just aren’t funny anymore. It seems like blondes, rednecks, and Sarah Palin are the only safe targets lest the PC Police go into action. Enough already!
Of course, these pages of jokes are often attributed to George Carlin, Robin Williams, or maybe even Johnny Carson though none of them represent the kind of humor these guys would expose.
This Cosby fraud is more disturbing though. It represents reactionary chest pounding at its worst. It appeals to the absolute worst of a certain sub-element of a strain of conservative thinking and is horrifying in both its pretense and intolerance. Somehow, falsely attributing such low-life gutter thinking to a figure like Bill Cosby is supposed to give it credibility. Having seen so many of these, they almost seem to be coming from the same source. Wouldn’t it be great if there were some way to backwards engineer the email to get to its source, but the scoundrels who originate this kind of hatred seem to be hopelessly cloaked in cyberspace?
This reflects the same mentality of the absolute worst of talk radio as some of these might represent the same kinds of talking points radical idiots like Michael Savage might expose. It’s white trash “yokelism” and pure bigoted intolerance at its most obvious. What a horrible insult to Bill Cosby who has broken with the flow with his tough love approach to the dreadful issues facing a huge number of African-American citizens who have never been able to find their way into the American good life.
Conservatives are not hateful people. Conservatives believe in the strength and integrity of the individual, where the Constitution prevails, and each person rather than big institutions really matters. Conservatives tend to be Patriotic believing in the fundamental goodness of America and the potential of each citizen. This “Cosby” diatribe is full of self-flattering hatred and anger. Though some of the issues raised are surely legitimate, the tone and outlook on humanity reflected in the desired results is bigotry unmasked.
It’s time we catch up with the technology at our fingertips and hold EVERYONE responsible for spreading falsehoods, rumors, and other garbage responsible for their behavior if the originators can ever be found. There are viruses that actually do harm to our computers and their software, but then there are the idiot emails that waste our time and perpetuate idiocy.
Read this. Be on the lookout for such garbage and perhaps the folks who start these email chains can be outed.
Here’s the poop. (We mean that quite literally.)
FALSELY ATTRIBUTED TO BILL COSBY:
I HAVE DECIDED TO BECOME A WRITE-IN CANDIDATE.HERE IS MY PLATFORM:
Of course, these pages of jokes are often attributed to George Carlin, Robin Williams, or maybe even Johnny Carson though none of them represent the kind of humor these guys would expose.
This Cosby fraud is more disturbing though. It represents reactionary chest pounding at its worst. It appeals to the absolute worst of a certain sub-element of a strain of conservative thinking and is horrifying in both its pretense and intolerance. Somehow, falsely attributing such low-life gutter thinking to a figure like Bill Cosby is supposed to give it credibility. Having seen so many of these, they almost seem to be coming from the same source. Wouldn’t it be great if there were some way to backwards engineer the email to get to its source, but the scoundrels who originate this kind of hatred seem to be hopelessly cloaked in cyberspace?
This reflects the same mentality of the absolute worst of talk radio as some of these might represent the same kinds of talking points radical idiots like Michael Savage might expose. It’s white trash “yokelism” and pure bigoted intolerance at its most obvious. What a horrible insult to Bill Cosby who has broken with the flow with his tough love approach to the dreadful issues facing a huge number of African-American citizens who have never been able to find their way into the American good life.
Conservatives are not hateful people. Conservatives believe in the strength and integrity of the individual, where the Constitution prevails, and each person rather than big institutions really matters. Conservatives tend to be Patriotic believing in the fundamental goodness of America and the potential of each citizen. This “Cosby” diatribe is full of self-flattering hatred and anger. Though some of the issues raised are surely legitimate, the tone and outlook on humanity reflected in the desired results is bigotry unmasked.
It’s time we catch up with the technology at our fingertips and hold EVERYONE responsible for spreading falsehoods, rumors, and other garbage responsible for their behavior if the originators can ever be found. There are viruses that actually do harm to our computers and their software, but then there are the idiot emails that waste our time and perpetuate idiocy.
Read this. Be on the lookout for such garbage and perhaps the folks who start these email chains can be outed.
Here’s the poop. (We mean that quite literally.)
FALSELY ATTRIBUTED TO BILL COSBY:
I HAVE DECIDED TO BECOME A WRITE-IN CANDIDATE.HERE IS MY PLATFORM:
(1) 'Press 1 for English' is immediately banned. English is the official language; speak it or wait at the border until you can.
(2) We will immediately go into a two year isolationist posture to straighten out the country's attitude. NO imports, no exports. We will use the 'Wal-Mart's policy, 'If we ain't got it, you don't need it.'
(3) When imports are allowed, there will be a 100% import tax on it.
(4) All retired military personnel will be required to man one of our many observation towers on the southern border. (six month tour) They will be under strict orders not to fire on SOUTHBOUND aliens.
(5) Social security will immediately return to its original state. If you didn't put nuttin in, you ain't gettin nuttin out. The president nor any other politician will not be able to touch it.
(6) Welfare - Checks will be handed out on Fridays at the end of the 40 hour school week and the successful completion of urinalysis and a passing grade.
(7) Professional Athletes --Steroids - The FIRST time you check positive you're banned for life.
(8) Crime - We will adopt the Turkish method, the first time you steal, you lose your right hand. There is no more life sentences. If convicted, you will be put to death by the same method you chose for your victim; gun, knife, strangulation, etc.
(9) One export will be allowed; Wheat, The world needs to eat. A bushel of wheat will be the exact price of a barrel of oil.
(10) All foreign aid using American taxpayer money will immediately cease, and the saved money will pay off the national debt and ultimately lower taxes. When disasters occur around the world, we'll ask the American people if they want to donate to a disaster fund, and each citizen can make the decision whether it's a worthy cause.
(11) The Pledge of Allegiance will be said every day at school and every day in Congress.
(12) The National Anthem will be played at all appropriate ceremonies, sporting events, outings, etc.
Sorry if I stepped on anyone's toes but a vote for me will get you better than what you have, and better than what you're gonna get. Thanks for listening, and remember to write in my name on the ballot in November.
God Bless America !!!!!!!!!!!
Bill Cosby
Enough said? This is pure trash. Yet this kind of stuff flows around the email flow forwarded to forwarded to forwarded endlessly. This crap stops at this computer, and we bounce back. Who could possibly imagine a good man like Bill Cosby would ever express thoughts like this. How shameful it is to attribute such reactionary views to a truly wonderful America.
Cyber Insanity Out of Control



Cyberspace Creates a New Breed of Criminal: A Convenient Tool For the Radical Left
Last week the news broke that Sarah Palin’s personal email had been hacked apparently as investigators are turning up by the son of a prominent democrat. Now, talk show host Bill O’Reilly who was most outspoken on that those responsible for this crime must be prosecuted has had his site hacked with personal information about his subscribers published.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1958
Just how low does it go and what does this reflect of the mentality of those who would commit such crimes against decent American people especially given it goes beyond public figures like Ms. Palin and Mr. O’Reilly to everyday people who enjoy Bill O’Reilly’s material?
Computer hacking is an extremely serious crime that all citizens must treat as such. How does it differ from “grand theft” or “breaking and entering” for instance? There is no difference between stealing electronic data from a person as ones’ physical property. Likewise, given how much of a person’s financial records are on line, the cases of identity theft, charging up a huge balance on a person’s credit, or obtaining confidential information in a person’s or company’s procession it theft, pure and simple. Why should it be seen any different because a new medium is involved.
What is so disturbing about the Sarah Palin email hacking is how casually the news media treated the case and how much more interest there seemed to be that the chance existed their might be instances where she used her personal account to do state’s business. Hardly a news report went by without dropping the hint that perhaps that was going on and when Democratic surrogates for the Obama campaign were asked to comment, they couldn’t wait to make some comment about, “Well, we’ll just have to see what’s in those emails before we pass judgment on this!”
In other words, are they suggesting that if we assumed she did use her email for state’s business to keep it out of the state record, that would justify someone taking it upon himself to hack into her account to find out? Given that the radical left has become a culture where the ends justify the means surely some notion of cyber vigilantism would be just fine with them.
Email and the Internet have afforded our culture with a wealth of new possibilities, ways to share information and communicate in ways we never could have imagined the last time baseball’s post season came around without the New York Yankees present. The problem is we have the technology before all the ethical, moral, and legal issues have been fully conceptualized.
Meanwhile, there are plenty of left-wing extremists and anarchists who have no problem with using their knowledge of technology to destroy others, their reputations, and their financial security. There are also common criminals with technology skills and the psychologically impaired cyber thrill seeker who engages in this kind of treachery as well. They are all criminals. Their crimes are VERY serious. Their punishments must be severe including time in jail, monitoring of their on-line usage, and possible probation terms that would forbid them from using technological equipment from which they could inflict their chaos as well.
Our culture has gone through an incredible technology revolution in the past decade plus. What email and internet has provided us could be every bit as revolutionary as when Guttenberg invented the printing press. Just as the printed word made reading materials available to the masses and helped create the need for universal literacy which helped transform society to where the middle class prevailed, we’re only a few years into the cyber age where the possibilities are both fascinating and horrifying.
In a world where so few seem to have firm moral grounding and adhere to a rational and moral system of values, in this world of the “Me” generation and instant gratification, the task of making sure our technology advances serve the higher purposes and we don’t continue to see what’s happened with Sarah Palin’s email or Bill O’Reilly’s website will be assured.
There is one more aspect to this subject that should have every American concerned, cyber terrorism. If just a bunch of idiotic kids can do what they did to these two public figures, imagine what the Islamic extremists could do on a much grander scale.
Last week the news broke that Sarah Palin’s personal email had been hacked apparently as investigators are turning up by the son of a prominent democrat. Now, talk show host Bill O’Reilly who was most outspoken on that those responsible for this crime must be prosecuted has had his site hacked with personal information about his subscribers published.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1958
Just how low does it go and what does this reflect of the mentality of those who would commit such crimes against decent American people especially given it goes beyond public figures like Ms. Palin and Mr. O’Reilly to everyday people who enjoy Bill O’Reilly’s material?
Computer hacking is an extremely serious crime that all citizens must treat as such. How does it differ from “grand theft” or “breaking and entering” for instance? There is no difference between stealing electronic data from a person as ones’ physical property. Likewise, given how much of a person’s financial records are on line, the cases of identity theft, charging up a huge balance on a person’s credit, or obtaining confidential information in a person’s or company’s procession it theft, pure and simple. Why should it be seen any different because a new medium is involved.
What is so disturbing about the Sarah Palin email hacking is how casually the news media treated the case and how much more interest there seemed to be that the chance existed their might be instances where she used her personal account to do state’s business. Hardly a news report went by without dropping the hint that perhaps that was going on and when Democratic surrogates for the Obama campaign were asked to comment, they couldn’t wait to make some comment about, “Well, we’ll just have to see what’s in those emails before we pass judgment on this!”
In other words, are they suggesting that if we assumed she did use her email for state’s business to keep it out of the state record, that would justify someone taking it upon himself to hack into her account to find out? Given that the radical left has become a culture where the ends justify the means surely some notion of cyber vigilantism would be just fine with them.
Email and the Internet have afforded our culture with a wealth of new possibilities, ways to share information and communicate in ways we never could have imagined the last time baseball’s post season came around without the New York Yankees present. The problem is we have the technology before all the ethical, moral, and legal issues have been fully conceptualized.
Meanwhile, there are plenty of left-wing extremists and anarchists who have no problem with using their knowledge of technology to destroy others, their reputations, and their financial security. There are also common criminals with technology skills and the psychologically impaired cyber thrill seeker who engages in this kind of treachery as well. They are all criminals. Their crimes are VERY serious. Their punishments must be severe including time in jail, monitoring of their on-line usage, and possible probation terms that would forbid them from using technological equipment from which they could inflict their chaos as well.
Our culture has gone through an incredible technology revolution in the past decade plus. What email and internet has provided us could be every bit as revolutionary as when Guttenberg invented the printing press. Just as the printed word made reading materials available to the masses and helped create the need for universal literacy which helped transform society to where the middle class prevailed, we’re only a few years into the cyber age where the possibilities are both fascinating and horrifying.
In a world where so few seem to have firm moral grounding and adhere to a rational and moral system of values, in this world of the “Me” generation and instant gratification, the task of making sure our technology advances serve the higher purposes and we don’t continue to see what’s happened with Sarah Palin’s email or Bill O’Reilly’s website will be assured.
There is one more aspect to this subject that should have every American concerned, cyber terrorism. If just a bunch of idiotic kids can do what they did to these two public figures, imagine what the Islamic extremists could do on a much grander scale.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL INTRODUCES INSTANT REPLAY TONIGHT!!!




The fuzz brains in the League office have finally submitted to the use of Instant Replay only to determine whether a long fly-ball, deep-deep-deep, is or isn't a home run. All camera angles are assembled by the league office. The umpires leave the playing field. The crew chief makes the call. MEANWHILE, THE PARANOID POWERS THAT BE DO NOT ALLOW CONTROVERSIAL PLAYS TO BE SHOWN ON STADIUM VIDEO DISPLAYS. Fans in the stands don't see anthing of what's going on unless they can see it in a highlight package when they get home.
The Umpires in Baseball are perhaps no more incompetent than their peers in other sports, but they are the most arrogant and obtrusive. How often have we seen umpires bait players into arguments and look for conflicts? Nobody comes out to the park to watch umpires have it out with players. Umpires are at their best when they're invisible. If there is a tough call, they gather together and consult.
Likewise, as new technologies are introduced, they should be as unobtrusive as possible too. There surely are other plays that should be subject to Instant Replay like close plays at the plate and certain foul calls. It wouldn't be practical to subject every ball and strike call to replay, but umpires should be assessed on their accuracy. The camera shots and other readings that can help determine strike calls should be available to each team. Teams should be able to have some means of protest, granted such efforts wouldn't overturn games, to help improve the call of the game.
BULLY UMPIRES MUST GO. PERIOD. EVERY FAN KNOWS WHO THE BLOWHARDS ARE.
Like interleague play and wild cards, the use of instant replay looks like another good idea Baseball will screw up somehow. If it weren't such a great game....
Monday, August 25, 2008
Back to School


From Kindergarten to Doctoral Programs and Beyond, American Education Is In BIG Trouble
Right Minded Fellow will have lots to say about the current affairs in education from Kindergarten to post-graduate. On all levels, the American education experience is in trouble. The kinds of difficulties, their causes, and their solutions are quite diverse not necessarily having any common themes. However, two things are obvious: parents are not presented with the kinds of choices they deserve in determining their children's' future. Schools are failing miserably on all levels to provide appropriate instruction that will result in well-educated students who've been nurtured in a caring, moral environment early on and then are presented with the kinds of challenging alternatives to develop the knowledge, thinking skills, and values to be prepared for a rewarding well-rounded future. Meanwhile, for many families the cost of a college education is the single most expensive investment they will face. A student could require a thirty year loan that if the student is paying the loan could be saddled with that debt when into the college years of his or her own children.
These are just some things that come to mind this evening:
1. The failure of the public education and lack of alternatives for parents who are dissatisfied with what their local schools provide.
2. The failure to deal with exceptional children appropriately whether a child is exceptionally gifted and talented, has some alternative learning style, or exhibits some noticeable "at risk" qualities, the assembly line nature of public education is failing these deserving kids miserably.
3. Science, technology, math and engineering are all fields that need serious attention. All students need to have necessary computational skills, understand scientific issues as it affects their day to day lives, and be competent in utilizing the technology of the future which is becoming more a part of day-to-day life. As a matter of National Security, the United States must maintain its leadership in all facets of these domains whether it's maintaining our lead in weapons technology to defend us from hostile elements around the world, being on the cutting edge in introducing life-saving medical technologies, or being the chief innovator in product development. Additionally, science needs to defend its turf while being respectful and accommodating to faith-based beliefs without compromising scientific methodology.
4. The Teachers Unions are one of the most powerful enemies of meaningful educational reform. It's fascinating to see how they whine, whine, whine about teachers not being paid enough money while urging its members not to shop at Wal-Mart. HELLO!?!?!?
5. The high dropout rate and unsuccessful achievement scores of African-American students cannot be tolerated. Whether its the dreadful chaotic mess found in many urban school systems where any kind of meaningful instruction is close to impossible to the "polite" racism of, "Oh he's doing pretty well for a black kid," millions of deserving kids are being failed by a system that is making them failures. More young black men are involved on the wrong end of the criminal justice system than attending college. We cannot tolerate that.
6. Home schooling, private and parochial schools, charter school programs, privatization, and new technologies all need far more attention to replace and enhance the public school of the second half of the 20th century.
7. College education is not synonymous with vocational training. While the job market needs far better options for preparing students about the join the work force and retool workers who need new skills and perspectives later on, the intellectual and spiritual benefits of post-secondary education must not be compromised by more utilitarian concerns. While it would be outrageous if accounting or nursing students, as two examples, were not totally prepared to master professional examinations in their field, this approach is not appropriate for most liberal arts and other more creative or spiritual domains. The notion of some kind of national scholastic test for philosophy, the fine arts, divinity, or classic literature would be beneficial is totally absurd. These kinds of programs are vital to help the developing mind learn critical thinking abilities, to work outside the box, and to appreciate the moral and ethical consequences of where the world is heading today. Just recently, the Bush administration's attempt to make the accreditation process more vocationally oriented including the possibility of imposing standard exams for liberal arts programs drove out a brilliant assistant secretary for post-secondary who seemed to really "get it" on the whole big picture of where the post-secondary world is headed. All aspects of educational endeavors after high school need much work. Community colleges are a tremendous resource able to respond quickly to the needs of their localities and economies. On-line universities are prospering. The traditional four year university and its graduate programs are failing in so many ways. First, the escalating cost must be reigned in. Second, the political climate where extreme left wing dogma is censoring the free flow of diverse ideas has become overwhelming in many academic communities. These schools need to be the world's leaders in Science, Technology, Math, and Engineering. They're starting to lose their grip.
8. Education on all levels should be fun! The educational experience should enrich the individual, develop meaningful relationships, and create the kind of appreciation for the gifts of freedom and knowledge that as citizens of the United States, we are so lucky to be able to pursue.
9. Locally, it is unacceptable that Baltimore COUNTY Public Schools have a school board consisting of political appointments chosen by the Governor of the STATE of Maryland. Baltimore County schools provide a classic case study of the decline from excellence in the third quarter of the 20th century to pure mediocrity as the new millennium gets under way.
x
x
These are just a few of many themes and concerns, we look forward to discussing in the weeks ahead. From the political to the philosophical to the practical, the discussion is wide open. Let no stone be unturned. Every person from preschooler to retirees are involved.
x
x
Friday, August 22, 2008
What Obama Is Doing Right


HONEST INJUN!!! Geronimo embraces new warfare technology of the time. Consider the consequences if Native Americans had guns and ammo as Europeans pursued "manifest destiny." The little device pictured here could be John McCain's undoing.
One on area, the claim of Barrack Obama is a 21st candidate is right on. Obama is a student of the information age and his opponent is absolutely clueless. When it comes to using information technology Obama's campaign is darn near state of the art where the McCain effort has only made it to the 1980's, the dawn of cable television and cable news. What it amounts to is the Obama forces are fighting with guns and bullets where McCain's tribe has only spears, bows and arrows in its weapons cache.
Look at the swelling of anticipation concerning the Obama vice presidential pick. How did he intend to announce it? Sign up! The Obama campaign will email or instant message (I.M to the hip) the faithful who will be his campaign partner at the same moment the news media gets the word. This accomplishes two things. First, it gives his supporters a sense of involvement. They're special. They'll be the first to know. Second, in exchange, the Obama campaign machine now has a huge contact list it can pummel with information, talking points, replies to McCain attacks instantly. While a person is driving around running errands or sitting at his desk or working the line on the job, the Obama gang is shooting out the latest and greatest on what they're doing, and what is more influential than word-of-mouth to get the message out. "Hey did you hear, McCain doesn't know how many houses he has?"
John McCain has given all indications he doesn't know a BlackBerry from a dingle berry. He's admitted he doesn't know much about using computers and has no use for email. His campaign has been pretty good at getting response ads on television rapidly, but that's so 1980's! Around 1995, the launch of Windows 95, could be seen as the historical turning point, by the end of the decade, most of the population was on-line, had cell phones, or both. Howard Dean was the first candidate to fully embrace the information age to power up his campaign using the power of the Internet to get his message out and to suck up the donations from the faithful. Meanwhile, in part as response to a workaround to the McCain/Feingold restrictions, non-affiliated support groups, the infamous 527 groups took hold where MoveOn.org and others could do the Democratic party's dirty work posting vicious, darned near libelous attacks on Republican candidates or even Democrats who stray from the extreme leftist point-of-view. It didn't lead to Howard Dean being successful because Howard Dean is a world class asshole. (Another benefit of the information age, "RMF" can publish the exact truth as we just did on Howard Dean where the media and official campaigns have to tap-dance around with politically correct verbage!!!)
The technology was largely at hand four years ago. The Bush campaign had some ability using it whether old Dubya was sharp with those gadgets or not. Kerry showed little sophistication as well. However, those who were looking ahead to the future should have seen the obvious. Obama did. His competition so far has not. Just in the last four years, the handheld revolution has exploded where BlackBerry's provide a huge technology window from penthouses to hiking trails. Laptop computers are networked wirelessly. Even cheap cell phone service provides for text messaging. There is hardly a spot in the lower 48 states much less on the whole planet where even folks backpacking in the Rocky Mountains or sailing out in the middle of the Chesapeake Bay don't have access to information as it happens.
In the fast-paced lunge/response, response-to-response campaign information cycle, you snooze, you lose. A challenge not answered is a challenge lost.
Obama gets it. McCain does not. It is making a difference. Go to any active senior community and see how folks in their 80's are zipping all over cyberspace looking at pictures of their grandchildren, exploring hobbies, keeping informed, or learning what Medicare requirements are for an all-important piece of medical equipment they might need. It might not be McCain's calendar age that makes him too old, it might be his failure to keep up with the times.
The media hates John McCain. They want him to lose. The one way he can project over the media wall to the people is effective use of the new technologies, but you can't fight cannons with catapults. Geronimo, born and raised in Arizona territory, could well have been the most intense warrior as the Feds attempted to wipeout the last strong holds of Native American culture. The "Indian Chief" pictured with a rifle shows the irony of "too little, too late."
Got it John?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



