Treatment? How can Anthony Weiner possibly talk of treatment? This is elitist gobbledygook which portrays the offender as victim, a stance in the litigious society the United States has become when people in a position of power attempt to weasel out of the kind of responsibility and scorn most people would face for involvement in such onerous, disgusting, abusive, and demeaning behavior.
Modern liberal or progressive thinking when it involves communication through the media involves a sense of extreme sophistry where the integrity of plain expressive language is turned inside out and spun around attempting to remove responsibility from the true offender and place blame elsewhere.
How often have we seen variations of this theme employed in criminal defenses where a variant of this is being used by the baseless defense of the Caylee Anthony murder case where her hedonistic, narcissistic, compulsive liar mother, Casey, is being portrayed as a victim of sex abuse by her father and her brother thus not being able to accept responsibility for her behavior and acting in irrational ways insisting that she was so screwed up she couldn’t deal with the accidental drowning of her little two year old daughter? What a cynical, corrupt defense that is fishing for that one juror whose mind has been rotted by the kind of moral relativism Anthony Weiner is attempting to exploit to save his sorry rear end? Casey Anthony is an absolutely rotten excuse for a human being whose inability to accept any personal responsibility for anything much less being a mother sought to live a life of partying, tattoos, drugs, and booze – classic behavior without consequence.
While Anthony Weiner has not killed anybody, his contempt for society at large and sense that rules do not apply to him are painfully obvious. Think about what we knew of him before the scandal broke and what has ensued since. His persona was that of a rabid pit bull attack dog constantly abusively demeaning and insulting his political adversaries in the most graphic and inflammatory terms.
Screaming with violent anger on the House floor Weiner shouted shaking his finger, “You know, you gotta love these Republicans.” You guys have chutzpah." Going on to say, [the Republican Party] "are a wholly owned subsidiary of the insurance industry."
Responding to Republican desire to cut NPR funding, Weiner screamed and sneered arms waving violently, finger shaking in accusatory assault, "What a relief. I'm glad we got the economy back going. I'm so glad we secured our nuclear power plants. So glad Americans are going back to work. We discovered a target we can all agree on...it's Click And Clack."
He cranked up the viciousness with the most belittling manner, "The American people are not concerned about the economy around the world," with his brow pulsating in vicious anger, “They're staring at their radio station saying, get rid of Click and Clack. Finally my Republican friends are getting rid of them. Kudos to you."
For those who complain about the lack of civility and hateful rhetoric in Washington, DC, there is NO ONE equal to Anthony Weiner. There can be no doubt that he will be treated with far more consideration and humanity than that which he has ever shown his adversaries. One can only imagine if a Republican congressman had been caught with his pants down in the manner Weiner has and likewise attempted to snivel out of accepting his responsibility. We can hear the loud, nasal screaming voice and invectives now that he would have turned loose.
His initial reaction to his scandal was vintage Weiner and likewise one of the most disgusting displays of sick, self-serving viciousness we’ve ever seen. His insistence that he had been hacked and being so embarrassingly short on specifics were the kind of lies surely even his most unconditional supporters had to be able to intuit were lies. He toyed with and insulted the reporters confronting him on his perversion. He even went as far as to attempt to have a CBS reporter arrested for showing up at his office attempting to get some clarification on his story.
How can anyone who isn’t suffering from total moral collapse not hoping that Mr. Weiner comes down and comes down hard? Those who used to relish using him to carry their weight on the attack are ditching him in droves where the usual cast of villains, Harry Reid, Deborah Wasserman-Schultz, and Chris Van Holland are all demanding his resignation. Even Nancy Pelosi who seems to buy into the therapy approach (what a shocker that is) suggesting he’d do best to recover outside of the House.
So Anthony Weiner insists he should be entitled to a leave of absence to receive treatment for his perverted expositionism? He and his apologists once again quickly point out that he hasn’t broken any laws. Well, that remains to be seen, but if the standard of behavior of being a member in good standing is whether a legislator breaks the law is a disgustingly low standard suggesting that it’s obvious why our legislative body is inhabited by such unprincipled, self-serving, slimy weasels. Immorality isn’t just a religious judgment, it’s obvious unacceptable behavior based on how the offender abuses others. His behavior is sexist, boorish, abusive, dishonest, and demonstrates total disregard for acceptance of personal responsibility.
We must challenge anyone who would suggest that Anthony Weiner is not directly and completely for his behavior. It is Anthony Weiner’s selfish, egotistical, elitist personality, desire for control, instant gratification, and ability to use others as little more than his own play toys to satisfy his insatiable hubris that is in play. Weiner is a wicked pervert who is acting in a cruel, dishonest, and disgusting manner.
This horrible rotten hateful human being must accept responsibility for his behavior and accept all punishments justice demands must be imposed for his treachery. There is no quick way to absolution and for many of us; he will forever be incapable of earning trust and respect. Does anyone think there is anything in Weiner’s character suggesting he’s capable of a spiritual about face? When a person is so self-serving and sees himself as God of his own universe, this is what happens.
We think it’s perfectly acceptable for the public to demand retribution. While no decent person could treat him with the kind of contempt he shows others, that he should get a little taste of his own medicine only seems just.
.
Showing posts with label left wing loonies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label left wing loonies. Show all posts
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Lord forbid I defend the Palins, however, as the video clearly shows, there's something a little twisted by some folks on the left's point of view. Naturally, this would be shown on MSNBC.
Anthony Weiner is a person in whom the public trust has been bestowed. What he did was sick, perverted, and represents complete moral corruption, a sense that the rules don't apply to him.
Now can Sarah Palin be held responsible for her daughter getting knocked up? Only indirectly. Naturally people might speculate she was too wrapped up in her career or was not a responsible mother, but most folks who've had teenage daughers know things happen.
As for Bristol Palin, she was irresponsible. She exercised bad judgment and a lack of maturity. Bristol can be held up as an example to show the importance of avoiding premature and immature sexual encounters and if participating in the elicit act practicing proper protection. There is nothing wicked, no intent to take advantage of others, nothing perverted about her conduct.
Politics aside, where Weiner, of course, represents the extreme left of the Democratic party, how he conducts himself is the ultimate example of a throughly horrible human being, a sick and twisted mean-spirited man who lacks respect towards others and any trace of civil behavior.
For those liberal apologists who keep carping that Weiner didn't break any laws, first it's premature to say that. Second, if being a responsible person worthy of virtue only means obeying the law, that's an awfuly low standard. Weiner is the poster child for what a horrible, detestable, thoroughly rotten human being is all about.
We offer no sympathy for Weiner. We hope that Mrs. Weinder can steer threw this situation without having her life ruined anymore than what being in the company of a total bucket of scum has already inflicted upon her. God forbid, how sad it would be if reports of her being pregnant are true. Let us pray that there is nothing genetic to Weiner's hateful character, that Mrs. Weiner can divorce this scum bag, and that she can find a man who will love her and treat her child with unconditional love.
No matter how cynical we might be about the political process, we must accept that Anthony Weiner is exceptionally bad no matter who on Capitol hill might be compared to him. Even Nancy Pelosi has moral fabric Weiner lacks.
As for MSNBC and their panelists, what does anyone expect from a corrupt network of left-wing advocates.
.
Whatever Happened to Night Sticks and Mase?
Observe this. How low will unions go supporting their self-serving causes? How hateful it is that public employees loaded with perks that most private sector employees can't even dream of act as if they are not only entitled to pay and benefits they do not deserve but can act above the law, damage property, disturb the peace, and interfere with wonderful beneficial activities like special Olympics to show their contempt for the person the people of their state elected governor.
Their bully tactics don't win them support it shows them to be the greedy assholes they truly are.
The proper way to deal with them would be to remove them forcefully if necessary and if that meant whacking some jerks with night sticks and spray a little pepper spray in their kissers is more than justified.
People deserve to hear speakers in public forums. Freedom of speech means speakers have the right to be heard and audiences have the right to hear without harassment and intimidation by a bunch of union THUGS. Organized activities like Special Olympics deserve to hold their events without the lowest scum who are only interested in their interests at the expense of society at large. It is the state's duty to protect such activities and keep them from being disrupted.
If anyone wonders why public education has become such a horrible joke one need look no further than who represents teachers as a bargaining union and the actions of the politicians they're able to muscle in to office. Real meaningful reform dies at every turn where these numbskull thugs get involved. Wisconsin is fighting the good fight to improve their substandard schools and the unions are fighting them at every turn.
That these goons would disrupt Special Olympics is likewise reflective of how little their teachers truly care about their students even using them as pawns to their political advantage attempting to indoctrinate them into their mindless campaign contrary to the will of the greater community.
Fire them if they're not doing their jobs. Arrest them if they're breaking the law. Use night sticks and pepper spray if they don't comply with orders to obe the peace.
.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Anthony Weiner Must Go NOW!!!
![]() |
| Rude, perverted, boorish, overbearing, dishonest...HUMANITY AT ITS WORST. |
Can we just be honest, Anthony Weiner is simply a totally disgusting human being. This writer is sick of the classic liberal non-sense saying that his presence in Congress should be up to the voters and “we don’t know if any laws have been broken.”
If that’s the standard we’re willing to expect, is it any wonder our country is so screwed up and our leaders so contemptuous?
For his entire tenure in Congress, Weiner has made an art out of extreme boorishness and excessive rudeness casually taunting and insulting his colleagues interrupting them contrary to established House protocol. He has demonstrated pure incivility toward reporters scolding them for their attitudes and toying with them avoiding answering their questions.
Now we know he’s used electronic media to share pictures of his penis and other such things to various females he has contacted through social networking. Additionally, the attempt to which he attempted to deny responsibility for his conduct with typical Weiner rudeness underscores the kind of sick scoundrel he is even attempting to have an ABC reporter arrested for attempting to get an interview at his office.
People of such dishonor do not belong in what should be our nation’s most respected institutions and that we might sneer sarcastically at characterizing them as esteemed is thanks to loathsome wretches like Weiner whose conduct is simply unacceptable.
How many believe such conduct would not result in dismissal from jobs in the private sector?
If Anthony Weiner had any honor he’d resign immediately; however, no one should hold his or her breath. This man is a bastard and a total asshole in the highest degrees of possible insult and derision. Human beings don’t come much worse than this man. Find redeeming qualities that would make him anything less than a thoroughly disgusting, totally rotten human being.
No matter how this plays out, Weiner will be treated with more respect and decency than how he treated his adversaries in the past and will probably do in the future. He’s an egotistical pig who finds himself the center of the universe. However, that universe has gotten much smaller this past week and that’s a good thing.
Anthony Weiner will deserve all the insults about a real Weiner showing off his Weiner and lying about it claiming his communication devices were hacked but then creating nothing but insane excuses in response.
It’s time for Weiner to go. Right now, not later, no excuses, out the door, SCRAM!!!
.
Saturday, June 4, 2011
TRIUMPH FOR NOW ON TEXAS PRAYER CASE
Outrageous ban on religious speech overturned in Texas. This is a clear demonstration why Obama must be defeated. We cannot afford to have more left wing idealogues on the Federal bench who might have ruled differently on this case.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/03/texas-senator-blasts-judges-decision-to-forbid-public-prayer-at-high-school/
Talk about it! email: rightmindedfellow@comcast.net
.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/03/texas-senator-blasts-judges-decision-to-forbid-public-prayer-at-high-school/
Talk about it! email: rightmindedfellow@comcast.net
.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Lies and Sleaze -- The Norm for Democrat Ads
The left-wing activist group, The Agenda Project, has stooped to a new low in political advertising, scare tactics, and pure demagoguery reached a new low creating a television ad based on absolutely false assumptions in which “America the Beautiful” is played in the background while a faceless fellow supposedly Congressman Paul Ryan wheels grand mom down a path and pushes over off the cliff.
The suggestion that seniors face hardship from the elimination of Medicare is by no means supported by any major figure in the Republican Party, but questions become more urgent to be answered regarding the program’s future and how to best meet the needs of health care for senior citizens.
The ad under consideration is just one extreme example of an avalanche of vicious false attack ads playing to the most ignorant citizens’ worst fears. They are shameful and reveal just how opportunistic, sleazy, underhanded, and incapable of reasoned debate the proponents of the left have become.
Every American with respect for rational decision making and responsible governance must condemn these tactics and hold those who these ads support responsible. The Orwellian “Big Lie” has no place in our system.
We demand Erika Payne, the Agenda Project’s boss be held accountable for such vicious sleaze.
.
Friday, May 6, 2011
CRY ME A RIVER: Doesn't it figure Michael Moore is upset about Bin Laden execution...
Boo-hoo, get out the water board and give Mikey Fatso a little reality therapy. He's got his feelings hurt that our SEALS "assassinated" Bin Laden. He contends we're "better" than that. Our guys should have arrested him, put him on trial, and we could show the world how wonderful our system of justice is by being so insidiously fair to the world's lowest form of scum.
There is a sick sentiment among some elements on the left that somehow even the worst people in the world deserve respect as fellow human beings, ant they act as though they are better people by avoiding showing contempt for the absolute worst scum of the early. We should show regard for a demented villain who uses a sick notion of God and his religion as the justification for killing as many apostates or infidels, male, female, young, old -- it doesn't matter -- no shame in killing children, to fatso liberal lunatic, we afford them all the rights we'd show our own citizens. What baloney! Showing regard for figures like Bin Laden simply reveals a mind with too much real world experience so detached from reality so thoroughly lost in an intellectual fog reveals an impaired mental state where one's rational judgment is impared for the sake of their secular humanist ideology.
We feel no remorse for removing a dead branch from a tree. We don't feel sorry for the mass of tissue that will be discarded if we have a tumor or cist removed. We certainly have no qualms about exterminating insects who'd mess up an outdoor event like a picnic. Why should we not methodically remove a wicked human presence whose only reason for being is destroying us.
Let us celebrate Bin Laden's death knowing that with enough resolve and careful preparation, the most dreadful villains on this planet can be destroyed. Let us remain resolute that there is much work to be done. There are more merchants of death who must be removed. Let us dismiss the naive stupidity figures like Michael Moore represent subjecting them to the kind of ridicule and mocking their foolishness deserves. To take them seriously dilutes the seriousness of the fight that remains to defeat the forces of world wide Jihad.
Let's face it, if Michael Moore is unhappy something good must be going on that should make us happy!!!
REFERENCE ARTICLE: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/michael-moore-not-happy-bin-laden-execution-002129202.html
One should also look at the contempt and lack of respect Mouthy Maniac Moore showed George W. Bush, a decent and thoughtful man regardless of where one stands politically. Moore's comments would suggest he has more contempt for the pillars of big business, the defenders of the Capitalist system, those who have acheived great success in our society. While Moore talks the leftist talk through and through, we can't help but notice the extent to which he has avoided paying union scale wages in his productions. Ooops.
Give Michael Moore credit, however, he makes a great poster child along with Nancy Pelosi and deposed congressman, Alan Grayson, for what Left Wing Loons are all about.
Mikey, you're so wrong and so out of touch. If we wanted to make a "gotcha" film about tree huggers and union thugs, you'd be so fun to slap around: "The Michael Moore Story: Fat, Lazy, and Stupid is No Way to Get Through Life, Son" (thanks to "Animal House"), curt and to the point, "Clueless.'
.
There is a sick sentiment among some elements on the left that somehow even the worst people in the world deserve respect as fellow human beings, ant they act as though they are better people by avoiding showing contempt for the absolute worst scum of the early. We should show regard for a demented villain who uses a sick notion of God and his religion as the justification for killing as many apostates or infidels, male, female, young, old -- it doesn't matter -- no shame in killing children, to fatso liberal lunatic, we afford them all the rights we'd show our own citizens. What baloney! Showing regard for figures like Bin Laden simply reveals a mind with too much real world experience so detached from reality so thoroughly lost in an intellectual fog reveals an impaired mental state where one's rational judgment is impared for the sake of their secular humanist ideology.
We feel no remorse for removing a dead branch from a tree. We don't feel sorry for the mass of tissue that will be discarded if we have a tumor or cist removed. We certainly have no qualms about exterminating insects who'd mess up an outdoor event like a picnic. Why should we not methodically remove a wicked human presence whose only reason for being is destroying us.
Let us celebrate Bin Laden's death knowing that with enough resolve and careful preparation, the most dreadful villains on this planet can be destroyed. Let us remain resolute that there is much work to be done. There are more merchants of death who must be removed. Let us dismiss the naive stupidity figures like Michael Moore represent subjecting them to the kind of ridicule and mocking their foolishness deserves. To take them seriously dilutes the seriousness of the fight that remains to defeat the forces of world wide Jihad.
Let's face it, if Michael Moore is unhappy something good must be going on that should make us happy!!!
REFERENCE ARTICLE: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/michael-moore-not-happy-bin-laden-execution-002129202.html
One should also look at the contempt and lack of respect Mouthy Maniac Moore showed George W. Bush, a decent and thoughtful man regardless of where one stands politically. Moore's comments would suggest he has more contempt for the pillars of big business, the defenders of the Capitalist system, those who have acheived great success in our society. While Moore talks the leftist talk through and through, we can't help but notice the extent to which he has avoided paying union scale wages in his productions. Ooops.
Give Michael Moore credit, however, he makes a great poster child along with Nancy Pelosi and deposed congressman, Alan Grayson, for what Left Wing Loons are all about.
Mikey, you're so wrong and so out of touch. If we wanted to make a "gotcha" film about tree huggers and union thugs, you'd be so fun to slap around: "The Michael Moore Story: Fat, Lazy, and Stupid is No Way to Get Through Life, Son" (thanks to "Animal House"), curt and to the point, "Clueless.'
.
Friday, April 15, 2011
LOVE the Rich!!!!!
Enough of the bullshit. The tax the rich orgy is pure and simple greed and crass manipulation on the behalf of those who feel ENTITLED to the hard earned wages of other citizens.
The government created the national debt with their overspending and insane commitments. They are expecting those who are doing the most to keep the economy growing creating jobs and stability to bail them out and then turn around and call them greedy and avow they are not paying their "fair" share. What is fair about any of this?
The rhetoric of everyone should step forward and pay “their fair share” is pure NONSENSE. Even if “the rich” paid the same percentage of their wages as what the left-wing robbers call “working people” as if those who are better off don’t work, they’d pay a much huger share of the taxes. If $50,000 a year were typical wages, if withholdings were 20% person would pay $10,000 before deductions. Conversely at a flat 20%, someone earning $1,000,000 would pay $200,000. Obama’s plan would charge them $380,000 a year. Mr. Mean Greedy Rich Guy is paying more than seven times than what the “working” people make a year.
To suggest that accepting higher taxes would be “patriotic” is absurd. To suggest wealthy who obey the law and pay the taxes required of them are greedy is a LIE.
Is it not PATRIOTIC to stand up to a government that is out of control, seizing the citizens' earned finances and spending it with out any responsible discipline?
Those who require the least amount of support from the government are expected to say the most. How is that fair?
Pay your taxes to the government, and that money is GONE. For every dollar taken in via taxes, how much of that dollar goes to paying for health care or defense/ how much of it is wasted on government overhead? How much of it pays the national debt?
Through all of the left-wing, big government's rationale is a clear inference that is truly the BIG LIE in their logic. They suggest that most of the government's shortage of funds would never have become a problem if only "the rich' paid their fair share. They act as if the Bush administration's tax cuts are the main contributor to the budget shortfalls. All this is garbage.
They talk as if the money is theirs to begin with. They set up all kinds of false equations between the lack of money for those they consider the needy and those with wealth "taking" too much. We are beat over the head constantly with rhetoric about how "they" are letting babies die, children being poised, elderly being starved, and disabled dumped out of their wheelchairs. Who's paying the lion's share of taxes? Who pays higher pereentages of their income? The politics of class warfare is the basic assumption behind Marxism and all socialism. There is no cloaking they support the Marxist maxim, "From each according to his ability; to each according to their need."
Who is the government to determine that those who have worked hard and earned their money to have to surrender even more?
We repeat what responsible conservatives say time and time again, our government does not have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem! We demand that the government work to eliminate duplicated efforts, waste, inefficiency, unnecessary programs, benefits and salaries above and beyond what comparable workers in the private sector would earn, and cut out all the baloney. Work out not only a reasonable budget for the next fiscal year but show there is a plan in place for the next decade or longer. Share those numbers with the public, and then we can talk about whose burden it is to pay for what the government does. If the government is engaged in spending money for things that get no results, we owe the government nothing. They owe us more than just another empty explanation.
There’s a group called “Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength.” Their slogan is, “We should pay more. We want to pay more.”
They write the following plea:
DEAR MR. PRESIDENT, HON. HARRY REID, AND HON. JOHN BOENHER:
We are writing to urge you to put our country ahead of politics.
For the fiscal health of our nation and the well-being of our fellow citizens, we ask that you increase taxes on incomes over $1,000,000.
We make this request as loyal citizens who now or in the past earned an income of $1,000,000 per year or more.
Our country faces a choice – we can pay our debts and build for the future, or we can shirk our financial responsibilities and cripple our nation’s potential.
Our country has been good to us. It provided a foundation through which we could succeed. Now, we want to do our part to keep that foundation strong so that others can succeed as we have.
Please do the right thing for our country. Raise our taxes.
Thank you,
(Signed by over 80 “patriotic” millionaires)
Okay, first let’s finish our natural gagging response to such sanctimonious bullshit. If they are speaking for themselves, that’s fine. They can give as much money as they like to the government. We’d be interested in seeing how much they give charity right now knowing that most of them deliver more good per dollar than the government ever will. If they want some kind of proclamation to “compel” them to pay, okay maybe something can be arranged. However, how dare they speak for other millionaires.
Whatever amount of money they think they should pay might be very valuable money to another millionaire. Perhaps one is contemplating adding staff to his business. Maybe another millionaire is about to build an addition to his office which would provide money to a local building contractor. Perhaps another “rich” person might be getting ready to write a check to pay for scholarships at a local school, assist a community hospital or private school, or support a local program for battered women. Every cent so spent or donated would generate far more public good than waste than if spent in taxes.
Okay, let’s be real, some of them might be planning to go on a lavish vacation. If that vacation is within the United States, that’s money supporting airlines, hotels, restaurants, and all the people who work for them. What if they chose to join country clubs – country clubs provide jobs and run very efficiently. What isn’t spent on the upkeep of the facility itself goes almost exclusively for wages. They’re not in business to make a profit.
If those guilty rich simply save their money or put it in the market, that’s money increasing the value of what could later be loans for new houses, supporting pension funds, and plenty of other good purposes.
Folks don’t become millionaires by sitting around doing nothing. The vast majority get there by working very hard doing exceptional work for which they are rewarded with a substantial income. They didn’t just graduate from high school and become instantly rich. They provide ideas and do work that provides substantial value. Look at Bill Gates and how he became the wealthiest man in the world. Consider a fellow working as a stock boy in a grocery store, sold his motorcycle to buy a quality electric typewriter and a small pickup truck to start his own business which grew to be the top business of its kind in its region providing jobs for over twenty people. This is a real story. Ask an entrepreneur on the rise and listen to him tell what his fights are tangling with government regulation.
Folks who have contempt for millionaire are losers, ungrateful bastards, slackers, unrealistic uninformed rubes, and absolute fools. Let’s set the record straight and be realistic about what our money world is all about.
If it’s a matter of people paying their fair share, the rich should enjoy a huge tax DECREASE.
The government created the national debt with their overspending and insane commitments. They are expecting those who are doing the most to keep the economy growing creating jobs and stability to bail them out and then turn around and call them greedy and avow they are not paying their "fair" share. What is fair about any of this?
The rhetoric of everyone should step forward and pay “their fair share” is pure NONSENSE. Even if “the rich” paid the same percentage of their wages as what the left-wing robbers call “working people” as if those who are better off don’t work, they’d pay a much huger share of the taxes. If $50,000 a year were typical wages, if withholdings were 20% person would pay $10,000 before deductions. Conversely at a flat 20%, someone earning $1,000,000 would pay $200,000. Obama’s plan would charge them $380,000 a year. Mr. Mean Greedy Rich Guy is paying more than seven times than what the “working” people make a year.
To suggest that accepting higher taxes would be “patriotic” is absurd. To suggest wealthy who obey the law and pay the taxes required of them are greedy is a LIE.
Is it not PATRIOTIC to stand up to a government that is out of control, seizing the citizens' earned finances and spending it with out any responsible discipline?
Those who require the least amount of support from the government are expected to say the most. How is that fair?
Pay your taxes to the government, and that money is GONE. For every dollar taken in via taxes, how much of that dollar goes to paying for health care or defense/ how much of it is wasted on government overhead? How much of it pays the national debt?
Through all of the left-wing, big government's rationale is a clear inference that is truly the BIG LIE in their logic. They suggest that most of the government's shortage of funds would never have become a problem if only "the rich' paid their fair share. They act as if the Bush administration's tax cuts are the main contributor to the budget shortfalls. All this is garbage.
They talk as if the money is theirs to begin with. They set up all kinds of false equations between the lack of money for those they consider the needy and those with wealth "taking" too much. We are beat over the head constantly with rhetoric about how "they" are letting babies die, children being poised, elderly being starved, and disabled dumped out of their wheelchairs. Who's paying the lion's share of taxes? Who pays higher pereentages of their income? The politics of class warfare is the basic assumption behind Marxism and all socialism. There is no cloaking they support the Marxist maxim, "From each according to his ability; to each according to their need."
Who is the government to determine that those who have worked hard and earned their money to have to surrender even more?
We repeat what responsible conservatives say time and time again, our government does not have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem! We demand that the government work to eliminate duplicated efforts, waste, inefficiency, unnecessary programs, benefits and salaries above and beyond what comparable workers in the private sector would earn, and cut out all the baloney. Work out not only a reasonable budget for the next fiscal year but show there is a plan in place for the next decade or longer. Share those numbers with the public, and then we can talk about whose burden it is to pay for what the government does. If the government is engaged in spending money for things that get no results, we owe the government nothing. They owe us more than just another empty explanation.
There’s a group called “Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength.” Their slogan is, “We should pay more. We want to pay more.”
They write the following plea:
DEAR MR. PRESIDENT, HON. HARRY REID, AND HON. JOHN BOENHER:
We are writing to urge you to put our country ahead of politics.
For the fiscal health of our nation and the well-being of our fellow citizens, we ask that you increase taxes on incomes over $1,000,000.
We make this request as loyal citizens who now or in the past earned an income of $1,000,000 per year or more.
Our country faces a choice – we can pay our debts and build for the future, or we can shirk our financial responsibilities and cripple our nation’s potential.
Our country has been good to us. It provided a foundation through which we could succeed. Now, we want to do our part to keep that foundation strong so that others can succeed as we have.
Please do the right thing for our country. Raise our taxes.
Thank you,
(Signed by over 80 “patriotic” millionaires)
Okay, first let’s finish our natural gagging response to such sanctimonious bullshit. If they are speaking for themselves, that’s fine. They can give as much money as they like to the government. We’d be interested in seeing how much they give charity right now knowing that most of them deliver more good per dollar than the government ever will. If they want some kind of proclamation to “compel” them to pay, okay maybe something can be arranged. However, how dare they speak for other millionaires.
Whatever amount of money they think they should pay might be very valuable money to another millionaire. Perhaps one is contemplating adding staff to his business. Maybe another millionaire is about to build an addition to his office which would provide money to a local building contractor. Perhaps another “rich” person might be getting ready to write a check to pay for scholarships at a local school, assist a community hospital or private school, or support a local program for battered women. Every cent so spent or donated would generate far more public good than waste than if spent in taxes.
Okay, let’s be real, some of them might be planning to go on a lavish vacation. If that vacation is within the United States, that’s money supporting airlines, hotels, restaurants, and all the people who work for them. What if they chose to join country clubs – country clubs provide jobs and run very efficiently. What isn’t spent on the upkeep of the facility itself goes almost exclusively for wages. They’re not in business to make a profit.
If those guilty rich simply save their money or put it in the market, that’s money increasing the value of what could later be loans for new houses, supporting pension funds, and plenty of other good purposes.
Folks don’t become millionaires by sitting around doing nothing. The vast majority get there by working very hard doing exceptional work for which they are rewarded with a substantial income. They didn’t just graduate from high school and become instantly rich. They provide ideas and do work that provides substantial value. Look at Bill Gates and how he became the wealthiest man in the world. Consider a fellow working as a stock boy in a grocery store, sold his motorcycle to buy a quality electric typewriter and a small pickup truck to start his own business which grew to be the top business of its kind in its region providing jobs for over twenty people. This is a real story. Ask an entrepreneur on the rise and listen to him tell what his fights are tangling with government regulation.
Folks who have contempt for millionaire are losers, ungrateful bastards, slackers, unrealistic uninformed rubes, and absolute fools. Let’s set the record straight and be realistic about what our money world is all about.
If it’s a matter of people paying their fair share, the rich should enjoy a huge tax DECREASE.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Are the Democrats Going to the Dogs? Startling Evidence!!!
Florida Congresswomen with the doggie do is full of doggie doo.
Where do the Democrats find some of their leaders? Meet Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The 44 year old congresswoman is another New York Florida invader who was first elected to congress in 2004. When the Democrats need crocodile tears, count on Wasserman-Shultz to be there with her best faux-sincerity nodding her head with a stern reverent expression gushing malodorous liberal hormones. Her most outspoken positions are on strict gun control, absolute abortion rights, and hate crimes legislation. As her party ram-rodded Obama-Care through the house, she aggressively fought the Stupak-Pitts amendment which would have imposed limits on taxpayer-funded abortions. Wasserman Schultz is one of the most outspoken proponents of extreme political correctness going as far as protesting a public employee having a photograph of an American Flag pictured with a Christian Cross on her desk. As one of Nancy Pelosi’s most consistent rubber stamps, she was awarded the position of Chief Deputy Whip.
As a contrast to Republicans as the ultimate poster child for crybaby causes and a never ending nagging Nanny State, she has just been appointed Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. She’ll be instrumental in helping organize resources for the next election where insane scare mongering will be loud and shrill directed toward the Republican Party. Warming up for that, she spoke of the Republican efforts to cut the 2010 budget as creating a “death trap for seniors.’ Where have we heard that kind of nonsense before?
However, as we keep her resume in mind, there is no questioning that Wasserman-Schultz’s most obvious quality is her uncanny resemblance to a cocker-spaniel. Not only are there some noteworthy physical similarities, but her tendency to sniff and whine is also quite spaniel like too.
,
Where do the Democrats find some of their leaders? Meet Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The 44 year old congresswoman is another New York Florida invader who was first elected to congress in 2004. When the Democrats need crocodile tears, count on Wasserman-Shultz to be there with her best faux-sincerity nodding her head with a stern reverent expression gushing malodorous liberal hormones. Her most outspoken positions are on strict gun control, absolute abortion rights, and hate crimes legislation. As her party ram-rodded Obama-Care through the house, she aggressively fought the Stupak-Pitts amendment which would have imposed limits on taxpayer-funded abortions. Wasserman Schultz is one of the most outspoken proponents of extreme political correctness going as far as protesting a public employee having a photograph of an American Flag pictured with a Christian Cross on her desk. As one of Nancy Pelosi’s most consistent rubber stamps, she was awarded the position of Chief Deputy Whip.
As a contrast to Republicans as the ultimate poster child for crybaby causes and a never ending nagging Nanny State, she has just been appointed Chairman of the Democratic National Committee. She’ll be instrumental in helping organize resources for the next election where insane scare mongering will be loud and shrill directed toward the Republican Party. Warming up for that, she spoke of the Republican efforts to cut the 2010 budget as creating a “death trap for seniors.’ Where have we heard that kind of nonsense before?
However, as we keep her resume in mind, there is no questioning that Wasserman-Schultz’s most obvious quality is her uncanny resemblance to a cocker-spaniel. Not only are there some noteworthy physical similarities, but her tendency to sniff and whine is also quite spaniel like too.
,
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
![]() |
The Republicans want Harry Reid out as Senate Majority Leader and who can blame them. There’s no polite way to put it, Harry Reid is an asshole. Yes, we throw around nasty insults way too casually and too frequently these days, but each one defines a certain archetypal personality. Harry Reid is a world class asshole. Assholes make the worst kind of leaders. They’re petty, joyless, evoke no enthusiasm or passion. They’re whiny, inflexible, and totally lacking in whit or personality. They stick by their guns and deal with opposition and adversity in the smallest minded and begrudging way. Their very presence has a way of keeping everybody at each other’s throats. Those on his side are constantly on the defensive and often in emulating their boss try to out-asshole the big asshole. Hello Dick Durbin. He’s right up there on the asshole scale. Then there’s Chuckles Schumer who being an asshole is so second nature, he aspires to much worse labels of depravity – as in total ass, prick, shyster, pompous idiot….Chuckles is, well, think of being a kid spelling out words with Alphabits cereal or Alphabet soup, only instead of letters, you’re using whole words – those seven words George Carlin said could never be used on television. Okay, so the Republicans want Harry Reid out. They missed their golden chance last November when Sarah Palin came to town in Nevada, trumped up a lot of support for a feeble like-minded windbag rather than any of several figures who could have whipped only Harry’s ass hemorrhoids and all graciously retiring him from brow-beating and demeaning the whole nation through his position on Capitol Hill. Now, 85 have signed a petition to have Harry Reid resign. They were particularly offended when Reid whined allowed how awful it would be that if the Republican budget cuts went through that would be the end of one of Reid’s pet projects, a nice big fat Federal grant to support “Cowboy Poetry.” Reid made it sound like the Republicans were criminalizing the corny custom. This is how assholes do things – lie and whine. In truth, they simply felt it wasn’t worth a financially strapped Federal government paying for. Well, yippee-tie-one-on!!!
If their dream came true, then what? Dick Durbin—how would he make things any better? Take all of Reid’s bad qualities and add pompous and self-righteous to the “n-th” degree. Then there’s old Chucky, yep, Chuckles Schumer – a vicious pit bull of an attack dog, a lying cut-throat, an Ivy League educated fool whose factual gaffes would suggest an IQ more in line with Sarah Palin’s than what’s expected in the rarified elite domain of Harvard, Yale and Princeton.
Do the Republicans really want a good Democrat in charge – someone who’d make them look good and able to accomplish things? They really want someone who’s a pushover and there are very few of them in today’s Democratic Party. They’re so pumped up with their insane ideology, class warfare nonsense, and sense of entitlement – they’ll fight to the death with the notion that if they can save one lab rat from tooth decay, the whole fight was worthwhile.
The Republicans need to worry about themselves. They need to do the right things. They’ve got to get their message out and be ready to clobber the Democrats in the next election. Harry Reid is a fine useful idiot. How much mileage can be gained from having their top dog saying “no” to budget reform for the sake of “Cowboy Poetry?”
Harry Reid can make any reasonable man itch as if infected with a bad case of poison ivy, but they must treasure just what a uniquely qualified character Harry Reid truly is. Could the Democrats parade a more detestable, easy to despise person (oops – remember this is just the Senate – there’s Nancy Pelosi) Sorry, the guy is the poster child for Democratic Party obstructionism, small-minded thinking, and special interest support.
To the 85 signers of the petition, know a good thing when you have one. Harry Reid is in self-destruct mode. Let the old coot self-destruct on his own. His ass-holiness will take care of itself.
.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Obama Kool-Aid, Paul Krugman, Because I Say So
Elitism sucks. Once upon a time, the law was whatever the king said it was. Of course there are sleazy dictators and unscrupulous potentates who still uphold such notions and the consequence of speaking the truth can be lethal. Of course there are those who are just the messenger -- don't blame them, they speak for a higher power, but if you don't do as they say because they speak for Allah or some bizarre evil distortion of God, you'll wind up dead too. Elitism rules the mainstream media too as its number one source, The New York Times claims to cover "all the news that's fit to print." Of course who decides what's fit to print. The message is, this is what's to print BECAUSE WE SAY SO.
Like a corrupt kingdom or religion, the New York Times has its own psycho-disciples, who spread the creed not just presenting what they say is fit for our consumption, but who is right and who is wrong and exactly how the huddled masses are supposed to feel about their edicts. It takes little time before their most mighty mouthpieces and arbitrators of all that's fit, Maurine Dodd the erudite naysayer and ultra bitch of Paul Krugman, the fellow who's so big a mere chip on his shoulder isn't good enough, he requires a fine California sequoia for that purpose.
We, of course, are just a bunch of average Joe's, like the fictional Los Angeles detective, Joe Friday from Dragnet, his credo was, "The fact's, ma'am, just the facts." Is that too much to ask.
What American couldn't be outraged, angry, and scared by the horrible massacre where innocent citizens gathered and were murdered, congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords was shot, outside a Safeway in Tucson, Arizona?
The story was just beginning to unfold through out the news media, but within minutes of the report, there was Paul Krugman, the ominsicient seer, "it is because I say so," no time to gather facts, blaming the incident on rightwingers inflammatory speech being the cause suggesting that some whacked out, right wing extremist pulled the trigger. The edict hath been declared from high atop the great Ivory Tower of Wisdom, well maybe the gaudy bankrupt New York Times headquarters. okay truth be told, some grumpy old dork sitting at a computer keyboard. Quickly, the lower barkers started to yip from MSNBC to NPR. Quickly the facts piled up and their template simply didn't fit, but did they correct their error, hardly, they just barked louder and louder.
Meanwhile, their compatriots accused the other side of being Nazis, baby killers, racists, and just about any other label they could dream up. When it comes to inflammatory rhetoric and hate speech, what would they have to say about the union thugs and the spineless Wisconsin Democrats who fled the state, abandoning their jobs and resposibilities, screaming in heated hostile rants full of personal attacks and threats? If hate speech and inflammatory rhetoric is so awful doesn't the Wisconsin situation count? Nope, it doesn't fit, but if the Republicans tasked with trying to save the state from financial offered the slightest criticism of their adversaries -- look out!!
The bubbling hot domestic issue right now is economy. Would not one want to know how an Ivy League educated professor at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University hired to write substantial, highly informed column for the New York Times assesses such economic matters as the Federal Government's massive debt, should not us lowly subjects hang on his ever word?
He thinks so.
Normal folks and some lesser economists see higher gas prices, a huge debt with a government unwilling to reel it in, uncertainty on how the Arab world's chaos could affect fuel costs, how might the Japanese mess destabilize the world's markets, what will the impact of "Obama-care" and escalating health costs do, and how much more regulation and government restrictions further choke financial growth. This issues seem real and very threating. Some are very quantifiable. The world's economic state of 2011 does not provide a good climate for investment, hiring, and expansion.
Paul Krugman doesn't think so.
Things aren't bad. It's those horrible people who want to blame everything on Obama. Based on earlier columns he's written along with the wicked witch or is it blabbering bitch of the Ivort Tower, Maurine Dowd, they know what those people are all about -- THEY'RE HATERS, THEY'RE BIGOTS. They're trying to scare everybody and have tried to make that noble and nice Barack Obama the scapegoat. His opinion is Obama skeptics are flawed human beings whose judgment is so clouded with prejudice, one need not even be able to repeat what their point was, Krugman can simply dismiss it as out of hand. They're not Nobel Prize winners. they're just low life yokels they don't even have the stature to respond, because in the Land of the Ivory Tower, they'd have their tongues cut our to spare the impressionable masses the temptation of exploring notions that counter their edicts. The Empiror Obama is just and wise. The Empiror would never mislead the public and the Empiror would never bee seen in public without his luxurious clothes on. The public cannot believe what their lying eyes tell them. The Empiror is a man of exceptional style in splendorous fine adorments from head-to-toe. Yes, as messenger for the thrown, we should all heed,
"All This Stuff About Uncertainty is a Myth Made Up to Blame Unemployment on Obama."
Well there you have it. Somehow the little girl who shouted out the Empiror Obama isn't even wearing gym shorts and a Harvard tea shirt is making a lot more sense than Rube Krugman. If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it fall, does it make a sound? If the New York Times publishes a Paul Krugman column and no one heeds his tale, is it still real news?
While the empiror can't find his tea shirt for his grad school alma matter, maybe Mr. Krugman can at least lend him a Princeton tea shirt. If Ivy League tea shirts are like the prevailing ideologies articulated by their elites, one size fits all.
Reference article: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/04/03/krugman-all-stuff-about-uncertainty-myth-made-blame-unemployment-obam#ixzz1IVabuVXe
Like a corrupt kingdom or religion, the New York Times has its own psycho-disciples, who spread the creed not just presenting what they say is fit for our consumption, but who is right and who is wrong and exactly how the huddled masses are supposed to feel about their edicts. It takes little time before their most mighty mouthpieces and arbitrators of all that's fit, Maurine Dodd the erudite naysayer and ultra bitch of Paul Krugman, the fellow who's so big a mere chip on his shoulder isn't good enough, he requires a fine California sequoia for that purpose.
We, of course, are just a bunch of average Joe's, like the fictional Los Angeles detective, Joe Friday from Dragnet, his credo was, "The fact's, ma'am, just the facts." Is that too much to ask.
What American couldn't be outraged, angry, and scared by the horrible massacre where innocent citizens gathered and were murdered, congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords was shot, outside a Safeway in Tucson, Arizona?
The story was just beginning to unfold through out the news media, but within minutes of the report, there was Paul Krugman, the ominsicient seer, "it is because I say so," no time to gather facts, blaming the incident on rightwingers inflammatory speech being the cause suggesting that some whacked out, right wing extremist pulled the trigger. The edict hath been declared from high atop the great Ivory Tower of Wisdom, well maybe the gaudy bankrupt New York Times headquarters. okay truth be told, some grumpy old dork sitting at a computer keyboard. Quickly, the lower barkers started to yip from MSNBC to NPR. Quickly the facts piled up and their template simply didn't fit, but did they correct their error, hardly, they just barked louder and louder.
Meanwhile, their compatriots accused the other side of being Nazis, baby killers, racists, and just about any other label they could dream up. When it comes to inflammatory rhetoric and hate speech, what would they have to say about the union thugs and the spineless Wisconsin Democrats who fled the state, abandoning their jobs and resposibilities, screaming in heated hostile rants full of personal attacks and threats? If hate speech and inflammatory rhetoric is so awful doesn't the Wisconsin situation count? Nope, it doesn't fit, but if the Republicans tasked with trying to save the state from financial offered the slightest criticism of their adversaries -- look out!!
The bubbling hot domestic issue right now is economy. Would not one want to know how an Ivy League educated professor at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University hired to write substantial, highly informed column for the New York Times assesses such economic matters as the Federal Government's massive debt, should not us lowly subjects hang on his ever word?
He thinks so.
Normal folks and some lesser economists see higher gas prices, a huge debt with a government unwilling to reel it in, uncertainty on how the Arab world's chaos could affect fuel costs, how might the Japanese mess destabilize the world's markets, what will the impact of "Obama-care" and escalating health costs do, and how much more regulation and government restrictions further choke financial growth. This issues seem real and very threating. Some are very quantifiable. The world's economic state of 2011 does not provide a good climate for investment, hiring, and expansion.
Paul Krugman doesn't think so.
Things aren't bad. It's those horrible people who want to blame everything on Obama. Based on earlier columns he's written along with the wicked witch or is it blabbering bitch of the Ivort Tower, Maurine Dowd, they know what those people are all about -- THEY'RE HATERS, THEY'RE BIGOTS. They're trying to scare everybody and have tried to make that noble and nice Barack Obama the scapegoat. His opinion is Obama skeptics are flawed human beings whose judgment is so clouded with prejudice, one need not even be able to repeat what their point was, Krugman can simply dismiss it as out of hand. They're not Nobel Prize winners. they're just low life yokels they don't even have the stature to respond, because in the Land of the Ivory Tower, they'd have their tongues cut our to spare the impressionable masses the temptation of exploring notions that counter their edicts. The Empiror Obama is just and wise. The Empiror would never mislead the public and the Empiror would never bee seen in public without his luxurious clothes on. The public cannot believe what their lying eyes tell them. The Empiror is a man of exceptional style in splendorous fine adorments from head-to-toe. Yes, as messenger for the thrown, we should all heed,
"All This Stuff About Uncertainty is a Myth Made Up to Blame Unemployment on Obama."
Well there you have it. Somehow the little girl who shouted out the Empiror Obama isn't even wearing gym shorts and a Harvard tea shirt is making a lot more sense than Rube Krugman. If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it fall, does it make a sound? If the New York Times publishes a Paul Krugman column and no one heeds his tale, is it still real news?
While the empiror can't find his tea shirt for his grad school alma matter, maybe Mr. Krugman can at least lend him a Princeton tea shirt. If Ivy League tea shirts are like the prevailing ideologies articulated by their elites, one size fits all.
Reference article: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/04/03/krugman-all-stuff-about-uncertainty-myth-made-blame-unemployment-obam#ixzz1IVabuVXe
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Anthony Weiner -- What's in a Name???
Alan Grayson's gone, but for a fellow whose New York 9th congressional district almost borders directly on Coney Island, this wiener is no Nathan's hot dog, he's just a whiny little dick head as the video so marvelously demonstrates.
Why is Anthony Weiner a dick head? Should we try to be more civil?
We'll answer the second question first, in his snotty universe civility does not exist. How often has this prick been on news programs and after being given every opportunity to get his say in smirks, giggles, sneers, and shouts over other speakers on the panel never missing an opportunity to get a sarcastic jab or a demeaning insult thrown into to disruption.
This is a fellow who shouts down his colleagues on the floor of the house and interrupts news interviews in progress even the person and reporter involved are speaking on subjects that don't please him.
When it comes to any kind of mature, civilized, or respectful behavior Anthony Weiner exhibits none. Polite language fails us. On his best behavior, he's an obnoxious prick. More often than not he's a full blown dick head.
There was a time the position of congressman automatically commanded some measure of respect, but those days were long gone when the Brooklyn congressman arrived on the scene but from the get go this smart ass has proven himself hellbent on dragging things down to new lows.
Looking at his political positions -- he's as ultra-left as they come but from the most incredibly cynical point of view -- no naive idealism to be sure. It's his mission to identify those whose assets can be fleeced and redistributed elsewhere. Additionally, his economic policies are anti-business, anti-entrepreneurship, and certainly not ones that would solve any compelling issues like energy independence. While Anthony Weiner could be filed under the heading of "tax and spend liberal" he does so with such a passion and with such hatred towards those who are driving the economy, developing innovations, controlling government spending and helping our country reach toward the future as the most technologically advance country in the world. He would never trust that inventors or entrepreneurs can go about their business without the government supervising them every step of the way.
The basic equation is that a strong regulatory government needs to put its foot on the throat of anyone who can function independently. Only the government can determine who should be doing what and who gets what -- of course they are generally special interest groups who provide the backbone of the Democratic party.
The son of a lawyer and a public school math teacher, Weiner's first job out of college was working for (SURPRISE, SURPRISE) Congressman Chuck Schumer. Schumer mentored the little Weiner to pursue local politics and at 27, became the youngest member of the New York City council. When Chuck Schumer unseated incumbent Senator D'Amato victimized by the notorious Putzheaad scandal. Weiner ran to succeed Schumer and has maintained that position ever since. He has been one of the most aggressive pursuers of the government takeover of American health care. His staff has one of the highest turnover rates on Capitol Hill -- working for a dickhead, that should be of no surprise.
While such a loathsome bastard would make a great target for obliteration in congressional elections, his district is about as absolutely pure Democrat as a district could be. It's quite likely his antics are just fine with lots of the folk who elected the little Weiner to congress.
We regret that our blog just barely shows the degree of contempt Anthony Weiner so richly deserves. As long as his staunch advocacy of income redistribution coupled with his vicious, mean spirited conduct continue we can at least shower him in the contempt he deserves: Anthony Weiner, New York Congressman, District 9, long standing nominee for "dickhead of the year."
.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
GOD DAMNED LIES!!!!
The Wisconsin Democrats are screaming the Republicans STOLE democracy. Oh did they? Despite unruly mobs, intimidation, and threats against their safety, they have met as their jobs require to function as legislators who in pursuit of resolving Wisconsin's severe economic problems and create a more friendly atmosphere to attrack new jobs, carried on doing the business they were elected to do.
Meanwhile, who is stealing Democracy when rather than to show up and do the jobs they were elected to do in their state capital, the Democrat senators remain in self-imposed exile in Illinois. It is shameful and unlawful for them to refuse to fulfill the responsibilities they were elected to perform.
There must be severe consequences for their lawlessness. Sadly, the media is not providing honest coverage making them and the radical teachers' union appear the victims when in fact they are robbing the Wisconsin citizens blind.
They are loathsome greedy bastards to put it politely. Damnation on their house.
.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
More Insanity in Wisconsin -- UNION THUGS SHUT DOWN TOWNHALL
The news media will compare the union riot staged at a Wisconsin Townhall to citizens and tea party participants expresssing their views and venting some anger at Townhall meetings on Obamacare. Don't fall for the media lie!!!
The tea party people were not organized and directed to close down meetings. They did allow speakers to speak. They'd speak when it was their turn with passion and some got heated. They'd sneer and boo positions they didn't like but at least the speakers got their say in.
What you will see in this video is union thug activity. A coordianted attack to not allow an opposing view to speak. This is lawlessness and should be treated as such. Would it be to say that the greatest internal enemy to the United States is organized labor? If it's not them who is it?
We would not see it over the line for those who continue to disrupt meetings like this after being warned not to to be arrested and prosecutived for disorderly conduct. If they were whacked with night sticks and sprayed with pepper spray, that's fine with me aside from how the press would make martyrs of such loathesome scum.
.
The tea party people were not organized and directed to close down meetings. They did allow speakers to speak. They'd speak when it was their turn with passion and some got heated. They'd sneer and boo positions they didn't like but at least the speakers got their say in.
What you will see in this video is union thug activity. A coordianted attack to not allow an opposing view to speak. This is lawlessness and should be treated as such. Would it be to say that the greatest internal enemy to the United States is organized labor? If it's not them who is it?
We would not see it over the line for those who continue to disrupt meetings like this after being warned not to to be arrested and prosecutived for disorderly conduct. If they were whacked with night sticks and sprayed with pepper spray, that's fine with me aside from how the press would make martyrs of such loathesome scum.
.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
NPR BUSTED!!! Top Official Slams Jews, Tea Party, Conservatives and MORE!!!!!
If there's any lingering question about why taxpayers owe NPR NOTHING here it is. From the firing of Juan Williams to their latest meltdowns, NPR has shown its status as nothing more than a shoddy mouthpiece for the radical left. After all things considered and knowing they get money from George Soros, why should they get once cent of our money? After this video, they're toast.
.
.
Wisconsin Senate Democrats: The Audacity of Idiocy
Picture this, the Wisconsin Senate Democrats who have left Wisconsin for Illinois to prevent votes on legislative matters they oppose and don't have the votes to defeat are demanding that Governor Scott Walker meet with them to discuss possible solutions or compromises. Under normal circumstances, that's how the political process works, but they have one stipulation, that Governor Walker must meet with them in Illinois. Following that logic then, should Maryland Republicans demand Governor Martin O'Malley meet with them in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia or York, Pennsylvania because they have concerns about the Democrats' desire to raise the Maryland gasoline tax?
There is a proper place for Wisconsin legislators to meet with the executive branch of the government. That's in the State Capitol in Madison, Wisconsin. The farce these renegade lawmakers are advancing is an insurrection against civil government in the state they were duly elected to represent by performing the lawful legislative functions they took a sacred oath to honor.
This is all show for a sympathetic media that supports their agenda. Their tactic allows them to go on camera claim they're trying to work things out and that the Governor is being unreasonable refusing to meet them to discuss their issues. What the media soft petals and what is the true matter of law is that their exit to Illinois is not just unreasonable, it's unlawful. The are purposely violating the law to shut down the legal conduct of state business.
Citizens who look clearly and open-mindedly at what is going on in Wisconsin can clearly see how out of line the Senate Democrats, the Wisconsin Teachers' unions, and their supporters are out of line. The news media is not doing its job to report the news objectively in an impartial manner.
Society should have nothing but pure contempt for those empowered to make the law so boisterously flaunting breaking the law. For such conduct there must be severe and shift consequences.
For whatever value audacity might hold, the Wisconsin Senators have more than adequately overwhelmed that with their pure idiocy.
.
There is a proper place for Wisconsin legislators to meet with the executive branch of the government. That's in the State Capitol in Madison, Wisconsin. The farce these renegade lawmakers are advancing is an insurrection against civil government in the state they were duly elected to represent by performing the lawful legislative functions they took a sacred oath to honor.
This is all show for a sympathetic media that supports their agenda. Their tactic allows them to go on camera claim they're trying to work things out and that the Governor is being unreasonable refusing to meet them to discuss their issues. What the media soft petals and what is the true matter of law is that their exit to Illinois is not just unreasonable, it's unlawful. The are purposely violating the law to shut down the legal conduct of state business.
Citizens who look clearly and open-mindedly at what is going on in Wisconsin can clearly see how out of line the Senate Democrats, the Wisconsin Teachers' unions, and their supporters are out of line. The news media is not doing its job to report the news objectively in an impartial manner.
Society should have nothing but pure contempt for those empowered to make the law so boisterously flaunting breaking the law. For such conduct there must be severe and shift consequences.
For whatever value audacity might hold, the Wisconsin Senators have more than adequately overwhelmed that with their pure idiocy.
.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Thanks to Michelle Malkin: Conservative Teacher Reveals a Non-Conformist's Plight
RMF was once a public school teacher whose experience as an executive in his local teacher's union brought about his conversion from a classic liberal to conservative. What the reader is about to examine from a Minnesota teacher's point-of-view is an all too often reality for teachers who put their students first and embrace traditional values.
As more information about the state of public education becomes clear and citizens get a first hand look at what public teachers' priorities are, it becomes shockingly true that schools are what many have long thought they are intolerant enclaves of left-wing indoctrination where politics trumps professionalism and that completely inappropriate demeaning and insulting comments about Republicans and conservatives are not only taunts directed at non-compliant faculty members but also shared with students to intimidate them into to developing an anti-free enterprise, closed shop pro-union, pro-left wing agenda, political agenda.
The Minnesota teacher writing below expresses what is so common around the country. The behavior she cites cannot be tolerated and has no place in an institution funded by tax payers for the benefit of all citizens not just ones who drink the Democrat Kool-Aid.
From Michelle Malkin's site:
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/02/24/letter-of-the-day-the-plight-of-the-conservative-public-school-teacher/
.
As more information about the state of public education becomes clear and citizens get a first hand look at what public teachers' priorities are, it becomes shockingly true that schools are what many have long thought they are intolerant enclaves of left-wing indoctrination where politics trumps professionalism and that completely inappropriate demeaning and insulting comments about Republicans and conservatives are not only taunts directed at non-compliant faculty members but also shared with students to intimidate them into to developing an anti-free enterprise, closed shop pro-union, pro-left wing agenda, political agenda.
The Minnesota teacher writing below expresses what is so common around the country. The behavior she cites cannot be tolerated and has no place in an institution funded by tax payers for the benefit of all citizens not just ones who drink the Democrat Kool-Aid.
From Michelle Malkin's site:
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/02/24/letter-of-the-day-the-plight-of-the-conservative-public-school-teacher/
.
Media Critic, Brent Bozell, Sizes Up Mainstream Coverage of Wisconsin Insurrection
The way the battle lines have been drawn the viewer would see some rather obvious parallels between how the media covered the Egypt rebellion and the Wisconsin labor riot. Of course, Governor Scott Walker cast as the evil dictator Mubarak and the teachers, Obama union thugs, and other clowns as the Egyptian rebels.
It is also interesting to note how obscene, mean-spirited and filthy many of the chants, taunts, signs and banners are and what did these same reporters have to say about the conduct of the tea party rallies? These are the same people who scolded the tea party and conservatives for their angry rhetoric and insisted it led to the Tucson massacre. Truth be told, if one were to compare the vulgarity, viciousness, and over-the-top insults the tea party would be like a small town Boy Scout troupe compared to the Wisconsin thugs who'd be more like the vandals sacking Rome. The lack of proportion and honesty in this regard is inescapable for anyone who has paid careful attention to the coverage.
Brent Bozell, head of the Media Research Council brilliantly sizes up the press coverage in Wisconsin. Should anyone be surprised that the legendary pseudo-intellectual masquerading behind her snobbish foreign accent, Christiane Amanpour, should be responsible for some of the most ridiculous reportage.
Read this article, it's right on target: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bozell/2011/02/22/bozell-column-media-wisconsin-bad-joke
.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
The Wisconsin Plague Spreads to Indiana
And now the nonsense spreads to Indiana…Democrats refuse to show up to work to avoid facing votes they know they can’t win.
The Unions, the Democratic Party, and their lapdogs in the media are lying when they use words like “freedom’ and “rights.” What they are struggling with is a direct reflection of the population exercising its freedom in executing their right to vote. Their vote was contrary to what the pro-labor union agenda desires, and now those elected in free and honest elections (after all when elections run amuck, it’s often in urban areas where labor unions and their allies can manipulate the polls) the governor and state legislators are doing what they pledged to do for a majority of the population who voted.
The big ruckus in Wisconsin is not about taking away individual rights, all too the contrary. The governor and Republican legislature seeks to give state workers the FREEDOM not to join a union if they chose not to and elect to have their income that labor law mandated be taken from their salary without their consent be theirs to spend, save or invest as they see fit. Forcing workers to join unions is a restriction on freedom not an expression of freedom. People don’t have the right to belong to join a union when that choice is forced upon them. The Right to Work concept which 23 states currently enjoy allows employees to have the right to choose or not chose the right to join a union. The union, in turn, has to be more responsive to its membership because they have to behave in such a way that workers would see value in joining. In truth, unions silence workers. They speak for the employee to the employer. They determine how the company’s or tax payer’s money should be divided up and distributed to the workers. The result is a system that does not reward quality but instead time spent on the job.
Certainly, at the dawn of the industrial revolution when industries engaged in unscrupulous labor practices exploiting and abusing their work force, the union movement served a purpose, but that was 100 years ago. How much things have changed since World War II, yet unions act as if society owes them something for things they claim to have accomplished a century ago. To what do we still owe the British who implemented the Magna Carta. Our society is founded on the basis of the U.S. Constitution and aside from “right to assemble” and a few other provisions, nothing explicitly says society needs unions or that unions have any power to mandate anything. Yet we see efforts to destroy the democratic process with notions like “card check” where employees could be coerced into voting for union representation as their REAL right to vote in a secret election would be taken away.
So Wisconsin and Indiana are face with the reality that the vast majority of the public finds their lives are just fine without unions. They see how the union approach to business has led nowhere as many of those business no longer function in those states. They see where their tax money is going and that the Democratic party wants them to fork over more money for union employees who believe they have the right to all kinds of perks and benefits people who work in the real world do not get. They see their neighbors out of work and teachers crying because they’re not getting the raises they think they are entitled to receiving, that they are being asked to chip in for their lavish benefits albeit at a much lower percentage of income than most workers, and that they are upset because the majority believes they deserve the choice of how much they want the unions to “represent” them.
The will of the people is to hold government employees to terms of employment more like the private sector and that they cannot enjoy the perks of what amounts to a government run monopoly. The majority of Wisconsin and Indiana elected representatives are ready to act. How would the Democrats have acted if the Republicans could have obliterated a vote on Obamacare by not showing up on Capitol Hill? The answer is obvious, they’d be accused of killing babies, trying to screw the middle class, and all the usual rabble rousing and incitement of class warfare. The overreach of government that Obamacare woke people up on the state level that enough is enough. Americans expect people to do their jobs – when teachers fake illness and get fraudulent doctors’ excuses and elected officials do not show up in their chambers, they’re not doing their job. They should be treated the way most people would be if they behaved so irresponsibly, be disciplined and possibly fired but absolutely not paid. If the legislature is in session and there are no conditions (floods, epidemics, winter storms, hurricanes) that would prevent attendance at work, their seats should be declared vacant allowing business to go on and for them to be removed from office.
Yet they say they are exercising their rights. At every turn they are denying what has been established by society at large exercising its rights and that in doing what they claim are their rights but such behavior is illegal should be dealt with accordingly without pity or prejudice. The rule of law legally enacted by the representatives of the people must prevail and acting contrary to such must be treated as lawlessness.
To sympathize and support legislators who would flee their states they have a duty to support is irresponsible and intolerable. Those who report the news should take a hint and report the truth of the situation not what they want to truth to be.
It’s time for the will of the people to prevail. It’s time to end the union moment. Its time has passed and it is at its very best an expensive nuisance but in situations as we see today it is a sickly cancer on society that must be destroyed.
The Unions, the Democratic Party, and their lapdogs in the media are lying when they use words like “freedom’ and “rights.” What they are struggling with is a direct reflection of the population exercising its freedom in executing their right to vote. Their vote was contrary to what the pro-labor union agenda desires, and now those elected in free and honest elections (after all when elections run amuck, it’s often in urban areas where labor unions and their allies can manipulate the polls) the governor and state legislators are doing what they pledged to do for a majority of the population who voted.
The big ruckus in Wisconsin is not about taking away individual rights, all too the contrary. The governor and Republican legislature seeks to give state workers the FREEDOM not to join a union if they chose not to and elect to have their income that labor law mandated be taken from their salary without their consent be theirs to spend, save or invest as they see fit. Forcing workers to join unions is a restriction on freedom not an expression of freedom. People don’t have the right to belong to join a union when that choice is forced upon them. The Right to Work concept which 23 states currently enjoy allows employees to have the right to choose or not chose the right to join a union. The union, in turn, has to be more responsive to its membership because they have to behave in such a way that workers would see value in joining. In truth, unions silence workers. They speak for the employee to the employer. They determine how the company’s or tax payer’s money should be divided up and distributed to the workers. The result is a system that does not reward quality but instead time spent on the job.
Certainly, at the dawn of the industrial revolution when industries engaged in unscrupulous labor practices exploiting and abusing their work force, the union movement served a purpose, but that was 100 years ago. How much things have changed since World War II, yet unions act as if society owes them something for things they claim to have accomplished a century ago. To what do we still owe the British who implemented the Magna Carta. Our society is founded on the basis of the U.S. Constitution and aside from “right to assemble” and a few other provisions, nothing explicitly says society needs unions or that unions have any power to mandate anything. Yet we see efforts to destroy the democratic process with notions like “card check” where employees could be coerced into voting for union representation as their REAL right to vote in a secret election would be taken away.
So Wisconsin and Indiana are face with the reality that the vast majority of the public finds their lives are just fine without unions. They see how the union approach to business has led nowhere as many of those business no longer function in those states. They see where their tax money is going and that the Democratic party wants them to fork over more money for union employees who believe they have the right to all kinds of perks and benefits people who work in the real world do not get. They see their neighbors out of work and teachers crying because they’re not getting the raises they think they are entitled to receiving, that they are being asked to chip in for their lavish benefits albeit at a much lower percentage of income than most workers, and that they are upset because the majority believes they deserve the choice of how much they want the unions to “represent” them.
The will of the people is to hold government employees to terms of employment more like the private sector and that they cannot enjoy the perks of what amounts to a government run monopoly. The majority of Wisconsin and Indiana elected representatives are ready to act. How would the Democrats have acted if the Republicans could have obliterated a vote on Obamacare by not showing up on Capitol Hill? The answer is obvious, they’d be accused of killing babies, trying to screw the middle class, and all the usual rabble rousing and incitement of class warfare. The overreach of government that Obamacare woke people up on the state level that enough is enough. Americans expect people to do their jobs – when teachers fake illness and get fraudulent doctors’ excuses and elected officials do not show up in their chambers, they’re not doing their job. They should be treated the way most people would be if they behaved so irresponsibly, be disciplined and possibly fired but absolutely not paid. If the legislature is in session and there are no conditions (floods, epidemics, winter storms, hurricanes) that would prevent attendance at work, their seats should be declared vacant allowing business to go on and for them to be removed from office.
Yet they say they are exercising their rights. At every turn they are denying what has been established by society at large exercising its rights and that in doing what they claim are their rights but such behavior is illegal should be dealt with accordingly without pity or prejudice. The rule of law legally enacted by the representatives of the people must prevail and acting contrary to such must be treated as lawlessness.
To sympathize and support legislators who would flee their states they have a duty to support is irresponsible and intolerable. Those who report the news should take a hint and report the truth of the situation not what they want to truth to be.
It’s time for the will of the people to prevail. It’s time to end the union moment. Its time has passed and it is at its very best an expensive nuisance but in situations as we see today it is a sickly cancer on society that must be destroyed.
Columbia University: Elite Asses Heckle and Taunt Disabled Veteran
How should a former U.S. Army Staff Sergeant, a Purple Heart winner, who was shot eleven times and was disabled as a result expect to be treated an elite university that he now attends?
Anthony Maschek, 28, a native of Idaho, is a freshman at Columbia University in New York, who was in the 10th Mountain division infantry serving in Iraq and spent two years at Walter Reed hospital in rehabilitation from his injuries sustained when attacked by insurgents in Kirkuk receiving wounds to both legs, his abdomen, arm, and chest, had the opportunity to speak about his military experience in defense of reinstituting ROTC programs at the school. He enrolled in the Ivy League school to begin last fall’s semester. Columbia University has banned all activity by the military on campus for 42 years including ROTC programs and recruiters.
When speaking of his experience in Iraq and attempting to present the world situation the US is fighting, Columbia students shouted taunts at him including “RACIST!” This fine living example of sacrifice was jeered, booed, and laughed at.
Maschek’s main point to an audience of elite, well-educated fools, “It doesn't matter how you feel about the war. It doesn't matter how you feel about fighting. There are bad men out there plotting to kill you."
Columbia University has a long history of abusing figures who don’t agree with the prevalent radical ideology shouting down speakers and attacking them on stage. Is this not the very definition of intolerance? Overwhelming those with different points of view and silencing them from speaking to members of the audience who may or may not agree with them still want to hear their views IS intolerance in its most blatant and immoral form.
Individuals with established American values who believe in our Constitution, our culture’s accomplishments, or any notion that the United States is a force of good in the world go to Columbia with targets on their backs. To profess any kind of Judeo-Christian morality or God forbid, a stance against unlimited access to abortion would be treated as thought crimes. The typical charges are that good American patriots or anyone to the right of the most extreme left views of the Democratic party are of: imperialism, sexism, racism, hostility toward Islam, and an assortment of other “isms” of their choosing adhering to the most ideological form of extreme political correctness. Anyone who has the slightest sympathy toward mainstream American values is almost certain to face attack and abuse. In contrast, Islamic extremists, communists, and very any professed adversary of the American way can bloviate endlessly without being challenged.
How ironic is it then that this same university would invite Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian madman dictator as a distinguished guest going as far as to instruct students how to behave appropriately for his appearance.
To think that Columbia is one of the nation’s most elite Universities like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton which have also created similar hostile environments of radical tyranny.
These are closed societies so lost in the abstract and theoretical sojourning endlessly in a world of sickly exaggerated, excessively arrogant intellectualism; they’ve lost all grasp of the world of true enterprise, entrepreneurial wisdom, and personal responsibility.
It’s time for the little people they belittle and seek to control through an ever expanding world of the politically correct nanny state to rise up and knock them down to size. For all their wealth, lineage, and academic prowess, the simple wisdom of heartland common sense eludes them that they would have the audacity to taunt a person permanently disabled on the firing line to defend the liberties they abuse so shamelessly. They are not to be revered but ridiculed and perhaps pitied that for all their prestige represents they are blind to the common goodness and immense sacrifice of the American soldier. For that and the influence they wield, we condemn them.
When serious post-secondary education reform is seriously considered, the Ivy League's hegemony over academia must be destroyed.
Reference Article: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/hero_unwelcome_Zi3u1fwtRpo87vXAiAQfSN#ixzz1Eff1txnq
.
Anthony Maschek, 28, a native of Idaho, is a freshman at Columbia University in New York, who was in the 10th Mountain division infantry serving in Iraq and spent two years at Walter Reed hospital in rehabilitation from his injuries sustained when attacked by insurgents in Kirkuk receiving wounds to both legs, his abdomen, arm, and chest, had the opportunity to speak about his military experience in defense of reinstituting ROTC programs at the school. He enrolled in the Ivy League school to begin last fall’s semester. Columbia University has banned all activity by the military on campus for 42 years including ROTC programs and recruiters.
When speaking of his experience in Iraq and attempting to present the world situation the US is fighting, Columbia students shouted taunts at him including “RACIST!” This fine living example of sacrifice was jeered, booed, and laughed at.
Maschek’s main point to an audience of elite, well-educated fools, “It doesn't matter how you feel about the war. It doesn't matter how you feel about fighting. There are bad men out there plotting to kill you."
Columbia University has a long history of abusing figures who don’t agree with the prevalent radical ideology shouting down speakers and attacking them on stage. Is this not the very definition of intolerance? Overwhelming those with different points of view and silencing them from speaking to members of the audience who may or may not agree with them still want to hear their views IS intolerance in its most blatant and immoral form.
Individuals with established American values who believe in our Constitution, our culture’s accomplishments, or any notion that the United States is a force of good in the world go to Columbia with targets on their backs. To profess any kind of Judeo-Christian morality or God forbid, a stance against unlimited access to abortion would be treated as thought crimes. The typical charges are that good American patriots or anyone to the right of the most extreme left views of the Democratic party are of: imperialism, sexism, racism, hostility toward Islam, and an assortment of other “isms” of their choosing adhering to the most ideological form of extreme political correctness. Anyone who has the slightest sympathy toward mainstream American values is almost certain to face attack and abuse. In contrast, Islamic extremists, communists, and very any professed adversary of the American way can bloviate endlessly without being challenged.
How ironic is it then that this same university would invite Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian madman dictator as a distinguished guest going as far as to instruct students how to behave appropriately for his appearance.
To think that Columbia is one of the nation’s most elite Universities like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton which have also created similar hostile environments of radical tyranny.
These are closed societies so lost in the abstract and theoretical sojourning endlessly in a world of sickly exaggerated, excessively arrogant intellectualism; they’ve lost all grasp of the world of true enterprise, entrepreneurial wisdom, and personal responsibility.
It’s time for the little people they belittle and seek to control through an ever expanding world of the politically correct nanny state to rise up and knock them down to size. For all their wealth, lineage, and academic prowess, the simple wisdom of heartland common sense eludes them that they would have the audacity to taunt a person permanently disabled on the firing line to defend the liberties they abuse so shamelessly. They are not to be revered but ridiculed and perhaps pitied that for all their prestige represents they are blind to the common goodness and immense sacrifice of the American soldier. For that and the influence they wield, we condemn them.
When serious post-secondary education reform is seriously considered, the Ivy League's hegemony over academia must be destroyed.
Reference Article: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/hero_unwelcome_Zi3u1fwtRpo87vXAiAQfSN#ixzz1Eff1txnq
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















